Electroencephalogram Biomarkers from Anesthesia Induction to Identify Vulnerable Patients at Risk for Postoperative Delirium.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium is a common complication in elderly patients undergoing anesthesia. Even though it is increasingly recognized as an important health issue, the early detection of patients at risk for postoperative delirium remains a challenge. This study aims to identify predictors of postoperative delirium by analyzing frontal electroencephalogram at propofol-induced loss of consciousness. METHODS: This prospective, observational single-center study included patients older than 70 yr undergoing general anesthesia for a planned surgery. Frontal electroencephalogram was recorded on the day before surgery (baseline) and during anesthesia induction (1, 2, and 15 min after loss of consciousness). Postoperative patients were screened for postoperative delirium twice daily for 5 days. Spectral analysis was performed using the multitaper method. The electroencephalogram spectrum was decomposed in periodic and aperiodic (correlates to asynchronous spectrum wide activity) components. The aperiodic component is characterized by its offset (y intercept) and exponent (the slope of the curve). Computed electroencephalogram parameters were compared between patients who developed postoperative delirium and those who did not. Significant electroencephalogram parameters were included in a binary logistic regression analysis to predict vulnerability for postoperative delirium. RESULTS: Of 151 patients, 50 (33%) developed postoperative delirium. At 1 min after loss of consciousness, postoperative delirium patients demonstrated decreased alpha (postoperative delirium 0.3 µV2 [0.21 to 0.71], no postoperative delirium 0.55 µV2 [0.36 to 0.74]; P = 0.019] and beta band power [postoperative delirium 0.27 µV2 [0.12 to 0.38], no postoperative delirium 0.38 µV2 [0.25 to 0.48]; P = 0.003) and lower spectral edge frequency (postoperative delirium 10.45 Hz [5.65 to 15.04], no postoperative delirium 14.56 Hz [9.51 to 16.65]; P = 0.01). At 15 min after loss of consciousness, postoperative delirium patients displayed a decreased aperiodic offset (postoperative delirium 0.42 µV2 (0.11 to 0.69), no postoperative delirium 0.62 µV2 [0.37 to 0.79]; P = 0.004). The logistic regression model predicting postoperative delirium vulnerability demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.73 (0.69 to 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that electroencephalogram markers obtained during loss of consciousness at anesthesia induction may serve as electroencephalogram-based biomarkers to identify at an early time patients at risk of developing postoperative delirium.