Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of single-sample network inference methods for precision oncology.
Deschildre, Joke; Vandemoortele, Boris; Loers, Jens Uwe; De Preter, Katleen; Vermeirssen, Vanessa.
Afiliación
  • Deschildre J; Lab for Computational Biology, Integromics and Gene Regulation (CBIGR), Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
  • Vandemoortele B; Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Loers JU; Department of Biomolecular Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
  • De Preter K; Lab for Computational Biology, Integromics and Gene Regulation (CBIGR), Cancer Research Institute Ghent (CRIG), Ghent, Belgium.
  • Vermeirssen V; Department of Biomedical Molecular Biology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
NPJ Syst Biol Appl ; 10(1): 18, 2024 Feb 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38360881
ABSTRACT
A major challenge in precision oncology is to detect targetable cancer vulnerabilities in individual patients. Modeling high-throughput omics data in biological networks allows identifying key molecules and processes of tumorigenesis. Traditionally, network inference methods rely on many samples to contain sufficient information for learning, resulting in aggregate networks. However, to implement patient-tailored approaches in precision oncology, we need to interpret omics data at the level of individual patients. Several single-sample network inference methods have been developed that infer biological networks for an individual sample from bulk RNA-seq data. However, only a limited comparison of these methods has been made and many methods rely on 'normal tissue' samples as reference, which are not always available. Here, we conducted an evaluation of the single-sample network inference methods SSN, LIONESS, SWEET, iENA, CSN and SSPGI using transcriptomic profiles of lung and brain cancer cell lines from the CCLE database. The methods constructed functional gene networks with distinct network characteristics. Hub gene analyses revealed different degrees of subtype-specificity across methods. Single-sample networks were able to distinguish between tumor subtypes, as exemplified by node strength clustering, enrichment of known subtype-specific driver genes among hubs and differential node strength. We also showed that single-sample networks correlated better to other omics data from the same cell line as compared to aggregate networks. We conclude that single-sample network inference methods can reflect sample-specific biology when 'normal tissue' samples are absent and we point out peculiarities of each method.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Syst Biol Appl Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: NPJ Syst Biol Appl Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Bélgica
...