Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Journey to Improve the College of American Pathologists Cancer Biomarker Reporting Protocols.
Baskovich, Brett; Baras, Alexander; Seethala, Raja R; Fitzgibbons, Patrick L; Schneider, Frank; Harris, Brent T; Khoury, Joseph.
Afiliación
  • Baskovich B; From the Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health Systems, New York, New York (Baskovich).
  • Baras A; the Department of Pathology, John Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland (Baras).
  • Seethala RR; the Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Seethala).
  • Fitzgibbons PL; the Department of Pathology, Providence St Jude Medical Center, Fullerton, California (Fitzgibbons).
  • Schneider F; the Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia (Schneider).
  • Harris BT; the Department of Pathology, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, District of Columbia (Harris).
  • Khoury J; the Department of Pathology, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Medicine, Omaha (Khoury).
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 148(10): 1105-1109, 2024 Oct 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38375737
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT.­ Biomarker reporting has increasingly become a key component of pathology reporting, providing diagnostic, prognostic, and actionable therapeutic data for patient care. OBJECTIVE.­ To expand and improve the College of American Pathologists (CAP) biomarker protocols. DESIGN.­ We surveyed CAP members to better understand the limitations they experienced when reporting cancer biomarker results. A Biomarker Workgroup reviewed the survey results and developed a strategy to improve and standardize biomarker reporting. Drafts of new and revised biomarker protocols were reviewed in both print and electronic template formats during interactive webinars presented to the CAP House of Delegates. Feedback was collected, and appropriate revisions were made to finalize the protocols. RESULTS.­ The first phase of the CAP Biomarker Workgroup saw the development of (1) a new stand-alone general Immunohistochemistry Biomarker Protocol that includes reporting for ER (estrogen receptor), PR (progesterone receptor), Ki-67, HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2), PD-L1 (programmed death ligand-1), and mismatch repair; (2) a new Head and Neck Biomarker Protocol that updates the prior 2017 paper-only version into an electronic template, adding new diagnostic and theranostic markers; (3) a major revision to the Lung Biomarker Protocol to streamline it and add in pan-cancer markers; and (4) a revision to the Colon and Rectum Biomarker Protocol to add HER2 reporting. CONCLUSIONS.­ We have taken a multipronged approach to improving biomarker reporting in the CAP cancer protocols. We continue to review current biomarker reporting protocols to reduce and eliminate unnecessary methodologic details and update with new markers as needed. The biomarker templates will serve as standardized modular units that can be inserted into cancer-reporting protocols.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Biomarcadores de Tumor Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Arch Pathol Lab Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Biomarcadores de Tumor Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Arch Pathol Lab Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
...