Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison between a Novel Radiofrequency-Balloon and a Standard Cryo-Balloon in Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis.
Teumer, Yannick; Miesbichler, Clemens; Katov, Lyuboslav; Mayer, Benjamin; Rottbauer, Wolfgang; Bothner, Carlo; Weinmann, Karolina.
Afiliación
  • Teumer Y; Department of Cardiology, Ulm University Heart Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
  • Miesbichler C; Department of Cardiology, Ulm University Heart Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
  • Katov L; Department of Cardiology, Ulm University Heart Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
  • Mayer B; Institute for Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, Ulm University, Schwabstraße 13, 89075 Ulm, Germany.
  • Rottbauer W; Department of Cardiology, Ulm University Heart Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
  • Bothner C; Department of Cardiology, Ulm University Heart Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
  • Weinmann K; Department of Cardiology, Ulm University Heart Center, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
J Clin Med ; 13(4)2024 Feb 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38398276
ABSTRACT
Background/

Objectives:

Single-shot devices are important tools for efficient pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF). In addition to the standard cryo-balloon (CB) catheter, a novel multi-electrode radiofrequency balloon-catheter (RFB, Heliostar, Biosense Webster, Irvine, CA, USA) with 3D-mapping-integration is available. Currently, there is no evidence allowing for a direct comparison between RFB-PVI and CB-PVI in a matched population. The study aimed to assess the procedural data, safety profiles, and outcomes of RFB-PVI versus CB-PVI.

Methods:

In this prospective registry study, symptomatic AF patients undergoing first-time PVI from January 2019 to April 2023, using RFB or CB, were included, with patients matched in a 12 ratio to reduce potential confounders.

Results:

The results from 171 consecutive RFB patients and 342 matched CB patients showed comparable recurrence-free survival after 12 months (81.3% RFB vs. 76.8% CB, p = 0.359). The RFB group had a longer procedure duration (88 vs. 73 min, p < 0.001) and longer fluoroscopy time (18.9 vs. 14.5 min, p < 0.001).

Conclusions:

In conclusion, the novel RFB system enables efficient and safe PVI, which is broadly comparable to the established CB system. However, the 3D-mapping integration in RFB did not reduce fluoroscopy time compared to CB.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania
...