Comparison between a Novel Radiofrequency-Balloon and a Standard Cryo-Balloon in Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis.
J Clin Med
; 13(4)2024 Feb 08.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38398276
ABSTRACT
Background/Objectives:
Single-shot devices are important tools for efficient pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF). In addition to the standard cryo-balloon (CB) catheter, a novel multi-electrode radiofrequency balloon-catheter (RFB, Heliostar, Biosense Webster, Irvine, CA, USA) with 3D-mapping-integration is available. Currently, there is no evidence allowing for a direct comparison between RFB-PVI and CB-PVI in a matched population. The study aimed to assess the procedural data, safety profiles, and outcomes of RFB-PVI versus CB-PVI.Methods:
In this prospective registry study, symptomatic AF patients undergoing first-time PVI from January 2019 to April 2023, using RFB or CB, were included, with patients matched in a 12 ratio to reduce potential confounders.Results:
The results from 171 consecutive RFB patients and 342 matched CB patients showed comparable recurrence-free survival after 12 months (81.3% RFB vs. 76.8% CB, p = 0.359). The RFB group had a longer procedure duration (88 vs. 73 min, p < 0.001) and longer fluoroscopy time (18.9 vs. 14.5 min, p < 0.001).Conclusions:
In conclusion, the novel RFB system enables efficient and safe PVI, which is broadly comparable to the established CB system. However, the 3D-mapping integration in RFB did not reduce fluoroscopy time compared to CB.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Clin Med
Año:
2024
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Alemania