Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Detection of urinary tract stones on submillisievert abdominopelvic CT imaging with deep-learning image reconstruction algorithm (DLIR).
Prod'homme, Sarah; Bouzerar, Roger; Forzini, Thomas; Delabie, Aurélien; Renard, Cédric.
Afiliación
  • Prod'homme S; Department of Radiology, Amiens University Hospital, 1 Rond-Point du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens Cedex 01, France.
  • Bouzerar R; Biophysics and Image Processing Unit, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
  • Forzini T; Department of Urology and Transplantation, Amiens University Hospital, Amiens, France.
  • Delabie A; Department of Radiology, Amiens University Hospital, 1 Rond-Point du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens Cedex 01, France.
  • Renard C; Department of Radiology, Amiens University Hospital, 1 Rond-Point du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054, Amiens Cedex 01, France. renard.cedric@chu-amiens.fr.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 49(6): 1987-1995, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38470506
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Urolithiasis is a chronic condition that leads to repeated CT scans throughout the patient's life. The goal was to assess the diagnostic performance and image quality of submillisievert abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) using deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) in urolithiasis.

METHODS:

57 patients with suspected urolithiasis underwent both non-contrast low-dose (LD) and ULD abdominopelvic CT. Raw image data of ULD CT were reconstructed using hybrid iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V 70%) and high-strength-level DLIR (DLIR-H). The performance of ULD CT for the detection of urinary stones was assessed by two readers and compared with LD CT with ASIR-V 70% as a reference standard. Image quality was assessed subjectively and objectively.

RESULTS:

266 stones were detected in 38 patients. Mean effective dose was 0.59 mSv for ULD CT and 1.96 mSv for LD CT. For diagnostic performance, sensitivity and specificity were 89% and 94%, respectively, for ULDCT with DLIR-H. There was an almost perfect intra-observer concordance on ULD CT with DLIR-H versus LDCT with ASIR-V 70% (ICC = 0.90 and 0.90 for the two readers). Image noise was significantly lower and signal-to-noise ratio significantly higher with DLIR-H compared to ASIR-V 70%. Subjective image quality was also significantly better with ULDCT with DLIR-H.

CONCLUSION:

ULD CT with Deep Learning Image Reconstruction maintains a good diagnostic performance in urolithiasis, with better image quality than hybrid iterative reconstruction and a significant radiation dose reduction.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Algoritmos / Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador / Cálculos Urinarios / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Aprendizaje Profundo Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Abdom Radiol (NY) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Algoritmos / Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador / Cálculos Urinarios / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Aprendizaje Profundo Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Abdom Radiol (NY) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia
...