Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Difference Between Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate and Risk of Diabetic Microvascular Complications Among Adults With Diabetes: A Population-Based Cohort Study.
He, Daijun; Gao, Bixia; Wang, Jinwei; Yang, Chao; Zhao, Ming-Hui; Zhang, Luxia.
Afiliación
  • He D; Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Gao B; Institute of Nephrology, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, and Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
  • Wang J; Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of Immune-mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
  • Yang C; Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Zhao MH; Institute of Nephrology, Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China, and Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang L; Research Units of Diagnosis and Treatment of Immune-mediated Kidney Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Diabetes Care ; 47(5): 873-880, 2024 May 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38470988
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The impact of the difference between cystatin C- and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFRdiff) on diabetic microvascular complications (DMCs) remains unknown. We investigated the associations of eGFRdiff with overall DMCs and subtypes, including diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic kidney disease (DKD), and diabetic neuropathy (DN). RESEARCH DESIGN AND

METHODS:

This prospective cohort study included 25,825 participants with diabetes free of DMCs at baseline (2006 to 2010) from the UK Biobank. eGFRdiff was calculated using both absolute difference (eGFRabdiff) and the ratio (eGFRrediff) between cystatin C- and creatinine-based calculations. Incidence of DMCs was ascertained using electronic health records. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate the associations of eGFRdiff with overall DMCs and subtypes.

RESULTS:

During a median follow-up of 13.6 years, DMCs developed in 5,753 participants, including 2,752 cases of DR, 3,203 of DKD, and 1,149 of DN. Each SD decrease of eGFRabdiff was associated with a 28% higher risk of overall DMCs, 14% higher risk of DR, 56% higher risk of DKD, and 29% higher risk of DN. For each 10% decrease in eGFRrediff, the corresponding hazard ratios (95% CIs) were 1.16 (1.14, 1.18) for overall DMCs, 1.08 (1.05, 1.11) for DR, 1.29 (1.26, 1.33) for DKD, and 1.17 (1.12, 1.22) for DN. The magnitude of associations was not materially altered in any of the sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS:

Large eGFRdiff was independently associated with risk of DMCs and its subtypes. Our findings suggested monitoring eGFRdiff in the diabetes population has potential benefit for identification of high-risk patients.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_sistemas_informacao_saude Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Nefropatías Diabéticas / Neuropatías Diabéticas / Retinopatía Diabética Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Care Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Contexto en salud: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de salud: 1_sistemas_informacao_saude Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Nefropatías Diabéticas / Neuropatías Diabéticas / Retinopatía Diabética Límite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Care Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China
...