Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Machine learning models help differentiate between causes of recurrent spontaneous vertigo.
Wang, Chao; Young, Allison S; Raj, Chahat; Bradshaw, Andrew P; Nham, Benjamin; Rosengren, Sally M; Calic, Zeljka; Burke, David; Halmagyi, G Michael; Bharathy, Gnana K; Prasad, Mukesh; Welgampola, Miriam S.
Afiliación
  • Wang C; Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
  • Young AS; Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Raj C; Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Bradshaw AP; School of Computer Science, Faculty of Engineering and Information Technology, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Nham B; Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
  • Rosengren SM; Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
  • Calic Z; Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Burke D; Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
  • Halmagyi GM; Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
  • Bharathy GK; Department of Neurophysiology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
  • Prasad M; South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
  • Welgampola MS; Institute of Clinical Neurosciences, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
J Neurol ; 271(6): 3426-3438, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38520520
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Vestibular migraine (VM) and Menière's disease (MD) are two common causes of recurrent spontaneous vertigo. Using history, video-nystagmography and audiovestibular tests, we developed machine learning models to separate these two disorders.

METHODS:

We recruited patients with VM or MD from a neurology outpatient facility. One hundred features from six "feature subsets" history, acute video-nystagmography and four laboratory tests (video head impulse test, vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials, caloric testing and audiogram) were used. We applied ten machine learning algorithms to develop classification models. Modelling was performed using three "tiers" of data availability to simulate three clinical settings. "Tier 1" used all available data to simulate the neuro-otology clinic, "Tier 2" used only history, audiogram and caloric test data, representing the general neurology clinic, and "Tier 3" used history alone as occurs in primary care. Model performance was evaluated using tenfold cross-validation.

RESULTS:

Data from 160 patients with VM and 114 with MD were used for model development. All models effectively separated the two disorders for all three tiers, with accuracies of 85.77-97.81%. The best performing algorithms (AdaBoost and Random Forest) yielded accuracies of 97.81% (95% CI 95.24-99.60), 94.53% (91.09-99.52%) and 92.34% (92.28-96.76%) for tiers 1, 2 and 3. The best feature subset combination was history, acute video-nystagmography, video head impulse test and caloric testing, and the best single feature subset was history.

CONCLUSIONS:

Machine learning models can accurately differentiate between VM and MD and are promising tools to assist diagnosis by medical practitioners with diverse levels of expertise and resources.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vértigo / Aprendizaje Automático / Enfermedad de Meniere / Trastornos Migrañosos Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vértigo / Aprendizaje Automático / Enfermedad de Meniere / Trastornos Migrañosos Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Neurol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia
...