What We Do, What We Say, What We Don't Say: Confidentiality In The Publication Of Clinical Writing.
Psychoanal Q
; 93(1): 77-103, 2024.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38578266
ABSTRACT
Questions concerning analysts' publication of material from the analyses of their patients have troubled the field of psychoanalysis since its inception. Disguise inevitably distorts the clinical material and is often insufficient to protect the patient from recognition. Asking the patient's consent for publication intrudes upon and alters the analytic process. While analysts have largely reached a consensus about the need for anonymity in published material, there is still considerable debate about the necessity for obtaining patients' consent when using their material for publication. In this paper, I will trace the evolving meanings of disguise, and particularly of consent, in the analytic literature. I will place a particular emphasis upon the differing theoretical belief systems that underlie the analyst's decision to ask consent from her patient or not to do so, and I will argue that, although decisions on asking consent remain a complex matter, such coherent belief systems should play an important part in analysts' decisions regarding consent. I will illustrate my thought processes and some clinical situations with brief examples, and I will conclude with some practical recommendations, with the hope that these will stimulate further discussion in the analytic community.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Psicoanálisis
/
Terapia Psicoanalítica
Límite:
Female
/
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Psychoanal Q
Año:
2024
Tipo del documento:
Article