Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Critically Evaluating the Role for Postoperative Antibiotics in Patients Undergoing Urethroplasty With Buccal Mucosa Graft: A Claims Database Analysis.
Galansky, Logan; Gabrielson, Andrew T; Cohen, Andrew J.
Afiliación
  • Galansky L; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD. Electronic address: lgalans1@jhmi.edu.
  • Gabrielson AT; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Cohen AJ; The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
Urology ; 2024 Apr 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677376
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare outcomes among patients undergoing first-time urethroplasty with buccal mucosa graft (BMG) who receive postoperative antibiotics vs those who do not.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the TriNetX claims database between 2008-2022. Using CPT, ICD10, and LOINC codes, patients >18 years old undergoing primary urethroplasty with BMG who received an outpatient prescription for antibiotics between postoperative day 0-30 or did not were queried. Patients with positive preoperative urine culture or urinary tract infection (UTI) within 30days preoperatively were excluded. Surgical outcomes included 5-year revision rates and revision-free survival. Safety outcomes included new UTI within 30days, surgical site infection within 90days, or Clostridium difficile infection within 30days of urethroplasty.

RESULTS:

We identified 884 patients (81% antibiotic cohort, 19% nonantibiotic cohort) that met inclusion criteria. Age at time of urethroplasty, suprapubic tube presence, and pre-existing medical comorbidities were comparable between cohorts (Table 1A). There was no difference in 5-year rates and revision-free survival for endoscopic revision (11.5% vs 9.5%, relative risk (RR) 1.2, 95% CI [0.7, 2.0], recurrence-free survival (RFS) log-rank P = .6), re-do urethroplasty (12.9% vs 13.7%, RR 0.9, 95% CI [0.6, 1.5], RFS log-rank P = .7), or all-cause revision (19.8% vs 17.7%, RR 1.1, 95% CI [0.8, 1.6], P = .5) between groups. Postoperative rates of UTI, surgical site infection, and C difficile infection were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION:

In this large retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing urethroplasty with BMG, we observed no significant benefit from use of postoperative antibiotics on long-term revision rates or perioperative infectious complications.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Urology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Urology Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
...