Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The orthodontic extraction of second premolars: The influence on airway volume.
Mladenovic, Miodrag; Freezer, Simon; Dreyer, Craig; Meade, Maurice J.
Afiliación
  • Mladenovic M; Orthodontic Unit, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Freezer S; Orthodontic Unit, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Dreyer C; Orthodontic Unit, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
  • Meade MJ; Orthodontic Unit, Adelaide Dental School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. Electronic address: maurice.meade@adelaide.edu.au.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 166(1): 61-68, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38678455
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The extraction of second premolars and associated changes in the volume of the airway have not been previously explored. This retrospective study aimed to compare the volumetric changes of the airway preorthodontic and postorthodontic treatment in relevant extraction and control samples and to identify variables that may influence the outcome.

METHODS:

Cone-beam computed radiography scans of 54 patients with second premolar extraction and 59 nonextraction patients treated in a private orthodontic practice were matched for crowding. The average age for both samples was 15 years. The images were individually landmarked and measured by applying volumetric, linear, and angular parameters. The results were analyzed using repeated measures, such as variance analysis, correlation testing, and regression statistical analyses.

RESULTS:

There was a statistically significant increase in the airway volume for both groups (P <0.05). The difference in increase between the groups was not statistically significant. Seven variables demonstrated a collectively significant effect on changes to airway volume (F[7,112] = 38.48; P <0.001; r2 = 0.701), with 70% of the variation predicted by the variables. Multiple regression analyses indicated that changes to the area of minimum constriction (B = 32.45; t = 11.95; P <0.001) and changes to airway length (B = 94.75; t = 7.79; P <0.001) had a statistically significant effect on airway volume.

CONCLUSIONS:

The volume of the airway increased in both the extraction and nonextraction samples. The biggest contributors to the increase were an increase in airway length and an increase in the area of minimum constriction, which likely occurred as a result of natural growth.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Extracción Dental / Diente Premolar / Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico Límite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA / ORTODONTIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Extracción Dental / Diente Premolar / Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico Límite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Asunto de la revista: ODONTOLOGIA / ORTODONTIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia
...