Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early, precise, and safe clinical evaluation of the pharmacodynamic effects of novel agents in the intact human tumor microenvironment.
Gundle, Kenneth R; Rajasekaran, Karthik; Houlton, Jeffrey; Deutsch, Gary B; Ow, Thomas J; Maki, Robert G; Pang, John; Nathan, Cherie-Ann O; Clayburgh, Daniel; Newman, Jason G; Brinkmann, Elyse; Wagner, Michael J; Pollack, Seth M; Thompson, Matthew J; Li, Ryan J; Mehta, Vikas; Schiff, Bradley A; Wenig, Barry I; Swiecicki, Paul L; Tang, Alice L; Davis, Jessica L; van Zante, Annemieke; Bertout, Jessica A; Jenkins, Wendy; Turner, Atticus; Grenley, Marc; Burns, Connor; Frazier, Jason P; Merrell, Angela; Sottero, Kimberly H W; Derry, Jonathan M J; Gillespie, Kate C; Mills, Bre; Klinghoffer, Richard A.
Afiliación
  • Gundle KR; Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
  • Rajasekaran K; Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR, United States.
  • Houlton J; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  • Deutsch GB; Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Charleston, SC, United States.
  • Ow TJ; Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, United States.
  • Maki RG; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.
  • Pang J; Department of Pathology, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.
  • Nathan CO; Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New Hyde Park, NY, United States.
  • Clayburgh D; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, United States.
  • Newman JG; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, United States.
  • Brinkmann E; Department of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, United States.
  • Wagner MJ; Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Portland, OR, United States.
  • Pollack SM; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
  • Thompson MJ; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
  • Li RJ; Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Mehta V; Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Schiff BA; Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Wenig BI; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Swiecicki PL; Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Tang AL; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
  • Davis JL; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.
  • van Zante A; Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.
  • Bertout JA; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
  • Jenkins W; Department of Hematology Oncology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
  • Turner A; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States.
  • Grenley M; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
  • Burns C; Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
  • Frazier JP; Presage Biosciences, Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Merrell A; Presage Biosciences, Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Sottero KHW; Presage Biosciences, Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Derry JMJ; Presage Biosciences, Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Gillespie KC; Presage Biosciences, Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Mills B; Presage Biosciences, Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Klinghoffer RA; Presage Biosciences, Inc., Seattle, WA, United States.
Front Pharmacol ; 15: 1367581, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38681192
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Drug development is systemically inefficient. Research and development costs for novel therapeutics average hundreds of millions to billions of dollars, with the overall likelihood of approval estimated to be as low as 6.7% for oncology drugs. Over half of these failures are due to a lack of drug efficacy. This pervasive and repeated low rate of success exemplifies how preclinical models fail to adequately replicate the complexity and heterogeneity of human cancer. Therefore, new methods of evaluation, early in the development trajectory, are essential both to rule-in and rule-out novel agents with more rigor and speed, but also to spare clinical trial patients from the potentially toxic sequelae (high risk) of testing investigational agents that have a low likelihood of producing a response (low benefit).

Methods:

The clinical in vivo oncology (CIVO®) platform was designed to change this drug development paradigm. CIVO precisely delivers microdose quantities of up to 8 drugs or combinations directly into patient tumors 4-96 h prior to planned surgical resection. Resected tissue is then analyzed for responses at each site of intratumoral drug exposure.

Results:

To date, CIVO has been used safely in 6 clinical trials, including 68 subjects, with 5 investigational and 17 approved agents. Resected tissues were analyzed initially using immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization assays (115 biomarkers). As technology advanced, the platform was paired with spatial biology analysis platforms, to successfully track anti-neoplastic and immune-modulating activity of the injected agents in the intact tumor microenvironment.

Discussion:

Herein we provide a report of the use of CIVO technology in patients, a depiction of the robust analysis methods enabled by this platform, and a description of the operational and regulatory mechanisms used to deploy this approach in synergistic partnership with pharmaceutical partners. We further detail how use of the CIVO platform is a clinically safe and scientifically precise alternative or complement to preclinical efficacy modeling, with outputs that inform, streamline, and de-risk drug development.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Pharmacol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Pharmacol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...