Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quality of care measurement for patients with ovarian cancer in Japan.
Kakuwa, Tamaki; Watanabe, Tomone; Niino, Mariko; Kawata, Akira; Satoh, Toyomi; Matsumura, Noriomi; Yokoyama, Yoshihito; Kawana, Kei; Hirashima, Yasuyuki; Kyo, Satoru; Yasuda, Masanori; Harano, Kenichi; Machida, Hiroko; Tokunaga, Hideki; Kaneuchi, Masanori; Tabata, Tsutomu; Kobayashi, Yoichi; Nagase, Satoru; Katabuchi, Hidetaka; Mikami, Mikio; Yamamoto, Yoko; Rikitake, Ryoko; Ichinose, Yuichi; Higashi, Takahiro.
Afiliación
  • Kakuwa T; Division of Health Services Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Watanabe T; Department of Public Health and Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Niino M; Division of Health Services Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kawata A; Department of Public Health and Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Satoh T; Center for Cancer Registry, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Matsumura N; Division of Health Services Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yokoyama Y; Department of Gynecology, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan.
  • Kawana K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Tsukuba, Institute of Medicine, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • Hirashima Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, Japan.
  • Kyo S; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Aomori, Japan.
  • Yasuda M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Harano K; Division of Gynecology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Machida H; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Shimane, Japan.
  • Tokunaga H; Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
  • Kaneuchi M; Department of Experimental Therapeutics/Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
  • Tabata T; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Kobayashi Y; Department of Gynecology, Tohoku University Hospital, Miyagi, Japan.
  • Nagase S; Department of Gynecology, Otaru General Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan.
  • Katabuchi H; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Mikami M; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Yamamoto Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.
  • Rikitake R; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
  • Ichinose Y; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan.
  • Higashi T; Division of Health Services Research, Institute for Cancer Control, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 50(7): 1182-1191, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38697202
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Quality of care is important to reduce disease progression, and improve both survival and quality of life. The Japan Society of Gynecologic Oncology has published treatment guidelines to promote standardized high-quality care for ovarian cancer in Japan. We developed quality indicators based on the guideline recommendations and used them on large datasets of health service use to examine the quality of ovarian cancer care.

METHODS:

A panel of experts developed the indicators using a modified Delphi method. Adherence to each indicator was evaluated using data from a hospital-based cancer registry of patients diagnosed in 2018. All patients receiving first-line treatment at participating facilities were included. The adherence rates were returned to participating hospitals, and reasons for nonadherence were collected. A total of 580 hospitals participated, and the study examined the care received by 6611 patients with ovarian cancer and 1879 with borderline tumors using 11 measurable quality indicators.

RESULTS:

The adherence rate ranged from 22.6% for "Estrogen replacement within 6 months of operation" to 93.5% for "Bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin for germ cell tumor more than Stage II." Of 580 hospitals, 184 submitted the reasons for nonadherence.

CONCLUSIONS:

The quality of ovarian cancer care should be continuously assessed to encourage the use of best practices. These indicators may be a useful tool for this purpose.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Calidad de la Atención de Salud / Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Ováricas / Calidad de la Atención de Salud / Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón
...