Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A simple risk stratification model for prostate cancer using histopathologic findings of radical prostatectomy.
Semba, Remi; Uchida, Katsunori; Hirokawa, Yoshihumi; Shiraishi, Taizo; Onishi, Takehisa; Sasaki, Takeshi; Inoue, Takahiro; Watanabe, Masatoshi; Miyamoto, Hiroshi.
Afiliación
  • Semba R; Department of Oncologic Pathology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan.
  • Uchida K; Department of Pathology, Kuwana City Medical Center, Mie, Japan.
  • Hirokawa Y; Department of Oncologic Pathology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan.
  • Shiraishi T; Department of Oncologic Pathology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan.
  • Onishi T; Department of Pathology, Kuwana City Medical Center, Mie, Japan.
  • Sasaki T; Department of Urology, Japanese Red Cross Ise Hospital, Mie, Japan.
  • Inoue T; Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan.
  • Watanabe M; Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan.
  • Miyamoto H; Department of Oncologic Pathology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 2024 May 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704590
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To develop a simple postoperative risk stratification based on histopathologic findings from radical prostatectomy specimens.

METHODS:

This study included 3 cohorts of patients with a preoperative diagnosis of clinically localized prostate cancer 1 derivation cohort (n = 432) and 2 validation cohorts (n = 506 and n = 720). First, a postoperative risk stratification model was developed in the derivation cohort using the factors extraprostatic extension, surgical margin status, seminal vesicle invasion, and lymph node involvement. Each of the first 3 factors was assigned 0 or 1 point for negative or positive results, respectively, and the sum of the points, ranging from 0 to 3, was scored. pN1 was not scored but was analyzed separately. Validation cohorts were then used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the model. Additionally, we compared the model with the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score.

RESULTS:

Because the log-rank test showed no statistically significant differences between scores 1 vs 2 or score 3 vs pN1 in the derivation cohort, the following 3-level risk stratification was created low risk (score 0), intermediate risk (score 1-2), and high risk (score 3 or pN1). There were statistically significant differences in recurrence-free survival between any of 2 groups of 3-level risk stratification. This model similarly worked in both validation cohorts. The C indexes for the model were higher than those for the CAPRA score.

CONCLUSIONS:

This simple postoperative risk stratification model, based on radical prostatectomy findings, has a prognostic impact that has been validated in a multicenter population.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Clin Pathol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Clin Pathol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón
...