Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Unintended Exchange of Target Vessels for Celiac Trunk and Superior Mesenteric Artery Branches in Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair.
Enzmann, Florian K; Grandi, Alessandro; Panuccio, Giuseppe; Torrealba, José Ignacio; Kluckner, Michaela; Nana, Petroula; Rohlffs, Fiona; Kölbel, Tilo.
Afiliación
  • Enzmann FK; Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Grandi A; German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Panuccio G; German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Torrealba JI; German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Kluckner M; German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Nana P; Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
  • Rohlffs F; German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Kölbel T; German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
J Endovasc Ther ; : 15266028241251985, 2024 May 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708984
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) using branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR) is safe and effective. During deployment, the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) branch can unintentionally open into the celiac trunk (CT) ostium and switched catheterization of the SMA from the CT branch and the CT from the SMA branch can be used as an alternative technique in these cases. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of exchanging the intended target vessels (TVs) for the CT and SMA branches during BEVAR. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

A single-center retrospective analysis of patients with TAAAs who underwent BEVAR, using off-the-shelf or custom-made devices (CMDs), with an unintended exchange of TVs for the CT and SMA branches was performed.

RESULTS:

Between 2014 and 2023, 397 patients were treated with BEVAR for TAAA. Eighteen (4.5%) of those patients were treated with an exchange of TVs for the CT and SMA branches. T-branch was used in 9 cases (50%) and the remaining patients were treated with CMDs. Twelve patients were treated electively, 3 were symptomatic and 3 presented with rupture. Of 36 mesenteric TVs in those 18 patients, 34 (94%) were catheterized successfully, including all 18 SMAs and 16 of the 18 CTs. No branch stenosis or occlusion of the switched mesenteric TVs was detected during follow-up. During 30-day follow-up, 3 patients died and during a median follow-up of 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 1-15) months 3 more patients died. None of the deaths or the 2 unintended reinterventions was induced by the mesenteric TV exchange. The median hospital stay was 14 (IQR 9-22) days with a median of 4 (IQR 2-11) days at the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSION:

The exchange of the mesenteric TVs for the CT and SMA branches during BEVAR with off-the-shelf and CMD endografts is feasible with good TV patency and freedom from TV-related reinterventions. This alternative technique should be considered in selected cases when direct catheterization via the intended branch is deemed more time-consuming or not feasible. CLINICAL IMPACT This is the first description of using an exchange of target vessels for the celiac trunk and the superior mesenteric artery branches in patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing BEVAR, using off-the-shelf or custom-made devices. The high success rate as well as the good clinical results without any branch stenosis or occlusion during follow-up highlight the feasibility of this alternative technique. It could help in challenging cases when catheterization of the intended target vessels is not possible or too time consuming, resulting in higher success rates of BEVAR and better clinical results.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Endovasc Ther Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Endovasc Ther Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria
...