Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Changing Perceptions About the Dermatology Residency Application Process Among Applicants and Program Directors: 2020-2022.
Rinderknecht, Fatuma-Ayaan B; Bailey, Kandice C; Novack, Danielle E; Rosenblatt, Adena E; Dunleavy, Dana; Naemi, Bobby D; Rosman, Ilana S; Ahmed, Ammar; Worswick, Scott.
Afiliación
  • Rinderknecht FB; Dermatology, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, USA.
  • Bailey KC; Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.
  • Novack DE; Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
  • Rosenblatt AE; Dermatology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, USA.
  • Dunleavy D; Medical Education, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington DC, USA.
  • Naemi BD; Medical Education, Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington DC, USA.
  • Rosman IS; Dermatology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA.
  • Ahmed A; Dermatology, Dell Medical School - The University of Texas, Austin, USA.
  • Worswick S; Dermatology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, USA.
Cureus ; 16(4): e57864, 2024 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38725733
ABSTRACT
Importance Over the last two years, dermatology has undergone significant reforms in the residency application process in efforts to reduce applicant stress, increase equity, and due to the COVID-19 pandemic.  Objective We aimed to determine applicant and program director (PD) perspectives in implementing these changes over the last two application cycles.  Design, setting, and participants Anonymous online surveys were administered by the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) to PDs and applicants from the 2021-2022 dermatology residency application cycle. These results were compared with similar online surveys distributed after the 2020-2021 cycle. Results Coordinated interview release was introduced in the 2020-2021 dermatology application cycle. At that time, 57% of PDs and 84% of applicants wished that more programs participated in the release, compared to 53% and 84%, respectively, in the 2021-2022 cycle. In 2021, 28% of PDs reported matching applicants from their home institution higher on their list compared to 14% in 2022. In 2021 and 2022, 94% of PDs reported that diversity was an explicit goal in their application process. However, in 2021, 33% of PDs reported that they matched no UIMs (underrepresented in medicine) in their cohort, which grew to 39% in 2022. Conclusions This study identifies key trends in applicant and PD perspectives associated with changes in the application process such as coordinated interview release, virtual interviews, and emphasis on diversity. Additional data is needed from subsequent cycles in order to determine the efficacy of these reforms.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cureus Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...