Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interpretable multiphasic CT-based radiomic analysis for preoperatively differentiating benign and malignant solid renal tumors: a multicenter study.
Wu, Yaohai; Cao, Fei; Lei, Hanqi; Zhang, Shiqiang; Mei, Hongbing; Ni, Liangchao; Pang, Jun.
Afiliación
  • Wu Y; Department of Urology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
  • Cao F; Department of Urology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
  • Lei H; Department of Urology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
  • Zhang S; Department of Urology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China.
  • Mei H; Department of Urology, Shenzhen Second People's Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China.
  • Ni L; Department of Urology, Guangdong and Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine and Genetics, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
  • Pang J; Department of Urology, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen, China. pangjun2@mail.sysu.edu.cn.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 49(9): 3096-3106, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733392
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To develop and compare machine learning models based on triphasic contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) for distinguishing between benign and malignant renal tumors. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

In total, 427 patients were enrolled from two medical centers Center 1 (serving as the training set) and Center 2 (serving as the external validation set). First, 1781 radiomic features were individually extracted from corticomedullary phase (CP), nephrographic phase (NP), and excretory phase (EP) CECT images, after which 10 features were selected by the minimum redundancy maximum relevance method. Second, random forest (RF) models were constructed from single-phase features (CP, NP, and EP) as well as from the combination of features from all three phases (TP). Third, the RF models were assessed in the training and external validation sets. Finally, the internal prediction mechanisms of the models were explained by the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach.

RESULTS:

A total of 266 patients with renal tumors from Center 1 and 161 patients from Center 2 were included. In the training set, the AUCs of the RF models constructed from the CP, NP, EP, and TP features were 0.886, 0.912, 0.930, and 0.944, respectively. In the external validation set, the models achieved AUCs of 0.860, 0.821, 0.921, and 0.908, respectively. The "original_shape_Flatness" feature played the most important role in the prediction outcome for the RF model based on EP features according to the SHAP method.

CONCLUSIONS:

The four RF models efficiently differentiated benign from malignant solid renal tumors, with the EP feature-based RF model displaying the best performance.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Medios de Contraste / Aprendizaje Automático / Radiómica / Neoplasias Renales Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Abdom Radiol (NY) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Medios de Contraste / Aprendizaje Automático / Radiómica / Neoplasias Renales Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Abdom Radiol (NY) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China
...