Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Influence of hospital-level and surgeon factors on the outcomes after ileo-anal pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease: systematic review.
Giddings, Hugh L; Yang, Phillip F; Steffens, Daniel; Solomon, Michael J; Ng, Kheng-Seong.
Afiliación
  • Giddings HL; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Yang PF; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Steffens D; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Solomon MJ; Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Ng KS; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Br J Surg ; 111(5)2024 May 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740552
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis ('pouch surgery') provides a chance to avoid permanent ileostomy after proctocolectomy, but can be associated with poor outcomes. The relationship between hospital-level/surgeon factors (including volume) and outcomes after pouch surgery is of increasing interest given arguments for increasing centralization of these complex procedures. The aim of this systematic review was to appraise the literature describing the influence of hospital-level and surgeon factors on outcomes after pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS:

A systematic review was performed of studies reporting outcomes after pouch surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. The MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched (1978-2022). Data on outcomes, including mortality, morbidity, readmission, operative approach, reconstruction, postoperative parameters, and pouch-specific outcomes (failure), were extracted. Associations between hospital-level/surgeon factors and these outcomes were summarized. This systematic review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42022352851).

RESULTS:

A total of 29 studies, describing 41 344 patients who underwent a pouch procedure, were included; 3 studies demonstrated higher rates of pouch failure in lower-volume centres, 4 studies demonstrated higher reconstruction rates in higher-volume centres, 2 studies reported an inverse association between annual hospital pouch volume and readmission rates, and 4 studies reported a significant association between complication rates and surgeon experience.

CONCLUSION:

This review summarizes the growing body of evidence that supports centralization of pouch surgery to specialist high-volume inflammatory bowel disease units. Centralization of this technically demanding surgery that requires dedicated perioperative medical and nursing support should facilitate improved patient outcomes and help train the next generation of pouch surgeons.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino / Proctocolectomía Restauradora / Reservorios Cólicos Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino / Proctocolectomía Restauradora / Reservorios Cólicos Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Br J Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia
...