Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic value of BHI-V4 for heterogeneous and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus isolates: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cheng, Xin; Zhou, Juntong; Yuan, Fan; Ma, Jingxin; Guo, Shuilong; Su, Jianrong.
Afiliación
  • Cheng X; Clinical Laboratory Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Zhou J; Clinical Laboratory Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Yuan F; Department of Otolaryngology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Ma J; Clinical Laboratory Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
  • Guo S; Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. youyi_friendship@126.com.
  • Su J; Clinical Laboratory Center, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. youyi_lab@163.com.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 494, 2024 May 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745289
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Brain-heart infusion agar supplemented with 4 µg/mL of vancomycin (BHI-V4) was commonly used for the detection of heterogeneous (hVISA) and vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA). However, its diagnostic value remains unclear. This study aims to compare the diagnostic accuracy of BHI-V4 with population analysis profiling with area under the curve (PAP-AUC) in hVISA/VISA.

METHODS:

The protocol of this study was registered in INPLASY (INPLASY2023120069). The PubMed and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception to October 2023. Review Manager 5.4 was used for data visualization in the quality assessment, and STATA17.0 (MP) was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS:

In total, eight publications including 2153 strains were incorporated into the meta-analysis. Significant heterogeneity was evident although a threshold effect was not detected across the eight studies. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) was 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74-0.81). The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic score and diagnostic odds ratio were 0.59 (95% CI 0.46-0.71), 0.96 (95%CI 0.83-0.99), 14.0 (95% CI, 3.4-57.1), 0.43 (95%CI, 0.32-0.57), 3.48(95%CI, 2.12-4.85) and 32.62 (95%CI, 8.31-128.36), respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Our study showed that BHI-V4 had moderate diagnostic accuracy for diagnosing hVISA/VISA. However, more high-quality studies are needed to assess the clinical utility of BHI-V4.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Estafilocócicas / Staphylococcus aureus / Vancomicina / Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana / Antibacterianos Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Estafilocócicas / Staphylococcus aureus / Vancomicina / Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana / Antibacterianos Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Infect Dis Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China
...