Causal fairness assessment of treatment allocation with electronic health records.
J Biomed Inform
; 155: 104656, 2024 Jul.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38782170
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
Healthcare continues to grapple with the persistent issue of treatment disparities, sparking concerns regarding the equitable allocation of treatments in clinical practice. While various fairness metrics have emerged to assess fairness in decision-making processes, a growing focus has been on causality-based fairness concepts due to their capacity to mitigate confounding effects and reason about bias. However, the application of causal fairness notions in evaluating the fairness of clinical decision-making with electronic health record (EHR) data remains an understudied domain. This study aims to address the methodological gap in assessing causal fairness of treatment allocation with electronic health records data. In addition, we investigate the impact of social determinants of health on the assessment of causal fairness of treatment allocation.METHODS:
We propose a causal fairness algorithm to assess fairness in clinical decision-making. Our algorithm accounts for the heterogeneity of patient populations and identifies potential unfairness in treatment allocation by conditioning on patients who have the same likelihood to benefit from the treatment. We apply this framework to a patient cohort with coronary artery disease derived from an EHR database to evaluate the fairness of treatment decisions.RESULTS:
Our analysis reveals notable disparities in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) allocation among different patient groups. Women were found to be 4.4%-7.7% less likely to receive CABG than men in two out of four treatment response strata. Similarly, Black or African American patients were 5.4%-8.7% less likely to receive CABG than others in three out of four response strata. These results were similar when social determinants of health (insurance and area deprivation index) were dropped from the algorithm. These findings highlight the presence of disparities in treatment allocation among similar patients, suggesting potential unfairness in the clinical decision-making process.CONCLUSION:
This study introduces a novel approach for assessing the fairness of treatment allocation in healthcare. By incorporating responses to treatment into fairness framework, our method explores the potential of quantifying fairness from a causal perspective using EHR data. Our research advances the methodological development of fairness assessment in healthcare and highlight the importance of causality in determining treatment fairness.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Base de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Algoritmos
/
Registros Electrónicos de Salud
Límite:
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
/
Middle aged
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Biomed Inform
Asunto de la revista:
INFORMATICA MEDICA
Año:
2024
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
Estados Unidos