Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Metabolomics and Microbiome Analysis of Ethanol versus OMNImet/gene•GUT Fecal Stabilization.
Isokääntä, Heidi; Pinto da Silva, Lucas; Karu, Naama; Kallonen, Teemu; Aatsinki, Anna-Katariina; Hankemeier, Thomas; Schimmel, Leyla; Diaz, Edgar; Hyötyläinen, Tuulia; Dorrestein, Pieter C; Knight, Rob; Oresic, Matej; Kaddurah-Daouk, Rima; Dickens, Alex M; Lamichhane, Santosh.
Afiliación
  • Isokääntä H; Research Center for Infections and Immunity, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10, 20520 Turku, Finland.
  • Pinto da Silva L; Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku, Tykistönkatu 6A, 20520 Turku, Finland.
  • Karu N; Metabolomics and Analytics Centre, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden 2333 CC, The Netherlands.
  • Kallonen T; Department of Clinical Microbiology, Laboratory Division, Turku University Hospital, Kiinamyllynkatu 10 D, 20520 Turku, Finland.
  • Aatsinki AK; Clinical Microbiome Bank, Microbe Center, University Hospital and University of Turku, 20520 Turku, Finland.
  • Hankemeier T; Centre for Population Health Research, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 10A, 20520 Turku, Finland.
  • Schimmel L; Metabolomics and Analytics Centre, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden 2333 CC, The Netherlands.
  • Diaz E; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0187, United States.
  • Hyötyläinen T; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0187, United States.
  • Dorrestein PC; School of Science and Technology, Örebro University, 70281 Örebro, Sweden.
  • Knight R; Center for Microbiome Innovation, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-6607, United States.
  • Oresic M; Collaborative Mass Spectrometry Innovation Center, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman, La Jolla, California 92093-0657, United States.
  • Kaddurah-Daouk R; Center for Microbiome Innovation, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093-6607, United States.
  • Dickens AM; Turku Bioscience Centre, University of Turku, Tykistönkatu 6A, 20520 Turku, Finland.
  • Lamichhane S; School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 702 81 Örebro, Sweden.
Anal Chem ; 96(22): 8893-8904, 2024 06 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38782403
ABSTRACT
Metabolites from feces provide important insights into the functionality of the gut microbiome. As immediate freezing is not always feasible in gut microbiome studies, there is a need for sampling protocols that provide the stability of the fecal metabolome and microbiome at room temperature (RT). Here, we investigated the stability of various metabolites and the microbiome (16S rRNA) in feces collected in 95% ethanol (EtOH) and commercially available sample collection kits with specific preservatives OMNImet•GUT/OMNIgene•GUT. To simulate field-collection scenarios, the samples were stored at different temperatures at varying durations (24 h + 4 °C, 24 h RT, 36 h RT, 48 h RT, and 7 days RT) and compared to aliquots immediately frozen at -80 °C. We applied several targeted and untargeted metabolomics platforms to measure lipids, polar metabolites, endocannabinoids, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), and bile acids (BAs). We found that SCFAs in the nonstabilized samples increased over time, while a stable profile was recorded in sample aliquots stored in 95% EtOH and OMNImet•GUT. When comparing the metabolite levels between aliquots stored at room temperature and at +4 °C, we detected several changes in microbial metabolites, including multiple BAs and SCFAs. Taken together, we found that storing samples at RT and stabilizing them in 95% EtOH yielded metabolomic results comparable to those from flash freezing. We also found that the overall composition of the microbiome did not vary significantly between different storage types. However, notable differences were observed in the α diversity. Altogether, the stability of the metabolome and microbiome in 95% EtOH provided results similar to those of the validated commercial collection kits OMNImet•GUT and OMNIgene•GUT, respectively.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Manejo de Especímenes / Etanol / Metabolómica / Heces / Microbioma Gastrointestinal Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Anal Chem Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Finlandia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Manejo de Especímenes / Etanol / Metabolómica / Heces / Microbioma Gastrointestinal Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Anal Chem Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Finlandia
...