Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interference of hemoglobin variants with HbA1c measurements: comparison of 6 commonly used HbA1c methods with the IFCC reference method.
Li, Mingyang; Ge, Song; Shu, Xin; Wu, Xiongjun; Liu, Haiyan; Xu, Anping; Ji, Ling.
Afiliación
  • Li M; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
  • Ge S; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
  • Shu X; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Wuhan Asia General Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  • Wu X; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Shenzhen Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
  • Liu H; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Wuhan Asia General Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
  • Xu A; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
  • Ji L; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Lab Med ; 2024 May 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38801245
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Glycated hemoglobin, or hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), serves as a crucial marker for diagnosing diabetes and monitoring its progression. We aimed to assess the interference posed by common Hb variants on popular HbA1c measurement systems.

METHODS:

A total of 63 variant and nonvariant samples with target values assigned by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (IFCC) reference method were included. We assessed 6 methods for measuring HbA1c in the presence of HbS, HbC, HbD, HbE, and fetal hemoglobin (HbF) 2 cation-exchange high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods (Bio-Rad D-100 and HLC-723 G8), a capillary electrophoresis (CE) method (Sebia Capillarys 3 TERA), an immunoassay (Roche c501), an enzyme assay system (Mindray BS-600M), and a boronate affinity method (Primus Premier Hb9210).

RESULTS:

The HbA1c results for nonvariant samples from the 6 methods were in good agreement with the IFCC reference method results. The Bio-Rad D-100, Capillarys 3, Mindray BS-600M, Premier Hb9210, and Roche c501 showed no interference from HbS, HbC, HbD, and HbE. Clinically significant interference was observed for the HLC-723 G8 standard mode. Elevated HbF levels caused significant negative biases for all 6 methods, which increased with increasing HbF concentration.

CONCLUSION:

Elevated levels of HbF can severely affect HbA1c measurements by borate affinity, immunoassays, and enzyme assays.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Lab Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Lab Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China
...