Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Canadian laboratory incidents with human pathogens and toxins: An overview of reports, 2016-2022.
Balbontin, Nathalie; Gauthier, Audrey; Abalos, Christine; Davis, Antoinette N; Lister, Meaghan.
Afiliación
  • Balbontin N; Regulatory, Operations and Emergency Management Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
  • Gauthier A; Regulatory, Operations and Emergency Management Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
  • Abalos C; Regulatory, Operations and Emergency Management Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
  • Davis AN; Regulatory, Operations and Emergency Management Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
  • Lister M; Regulatory, Operations and Emergency Management Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
Can Commun Dis Rep ; 50(5): 144-152, 2024 May 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835500
ABSTRACT

Background:

When the Public Health Agency of Canada's Human Pathogens and Toxins Act and Human Pathogens and Toxins Regulations came into force, the reporting of laboratory incidents to the Laboratory Incident Notification Canada (LINC) surveillance system became mandatory. This report summarizes the laboratory exposure and non-exposure data reported from 2016 to 2022, with a particular focus on factors that are not typically presented in LINC's annual report.

Methods:

Reported laboratory incidents from 2016 to 2022 were analyzed. Exposures were analyzed by severity, occurrence and root cause, and affected individuals were analyzed by disease outcome, role and applied interventions. Non-exposures were analyzed by incident type. Exposure and non-exposure incident rates were calculated.

Results:

Events reported to LINC totalled 928. Of those, 355 were confirmed non-exposures, 361 were confirmed exposures, and 111 were other events. Both exposure and non-exposure incident rates per 100 active licences peaked in 2018 (9.44 and 7.11, respectively). Most exposures were rated as minor or negligible severity. The most cited exposure occurrence types were sharps-related and procedure-related (23% each), and standard operating procedure-related root causes were most cited (24%). While 781 individuals were affected in the exposure incidents, most did not develop a laboratory-acquired infection (n=753; 96%) and received at least one form of treatment post-exposure (n=717; 92%). Inadvertent possession/production cases were the most common non-exposure incidents reported.

Conclusion:

Exposure and non-exposure incident rates have decreased since 2018. Among exposure incidents, sharps-related and procedure-related occurrences were the most common, and the root cause was usually a standard operating procedure. Non-exposure incidents were mostly inadvertent possession/production cases. Exposure and illness outcome severity was mostly minor.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Can Commun Dis Rep Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / EPIDEMIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Can Commun Dis Rep Asunto de la revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / EPIDEMIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
...