Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigation of SCCmec types using the real time PCR method in cefoxitin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates.
Saglam, Mustafa; Kiliç, Ibrahim Halil; Zer, Yasemin.
Afiliación
  • Saglam M; Gaziantep University Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Biology, 27310 Sehitkamil/Gaziantep, Turkey. Electronic address: msaglam_27@hotmail.com.
  • Kiliç IH; Gaziantep University Faculty of Arts and Science, Department of Biology, Gaziantep, Turkey. Electronic address: kilic@gantep.edu.tr.
  • Zer Y; Gaziantep University Faculty of Medicine Department of Medical Microbiology, Gaziantep, Turkey. Electronic address: yaseminzer@hotmail.com.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 50: 100649, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38876184
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an important pathogen that can cause many community and hospital-acquired infections. This study was conducted to investigate the SCCmec gene types responsible for methicillin resistance in MRSA isolates isolated from hospitalised patients. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

MRSA isolates isolated from samples sent from various clinics to Gaziantep University Hospital Microbiology Laboratory between March 2021-January 2022 were included in the study. Bacteria were identified using by VITEK 2 automated system. Cefoxitin (FOX) resistance was determined by the disc diffusion method according to EUCAST standards. Cefoxitin resistance was confirmed by the Penicillin Binding Protein 2' latex agglutination test. Types of mecA, mecC, coa, nuc, Panton Valentin Leukocidin (PVL), ccrC2, class A mec, SCCmec types in isolates detected as MRSA were investigated by real-time PCR.

RESULTS:

In this study, 116 isolates meeting the study criteria were examined. By detecting the nuc and coa genes in all isolates by PCR, the phenotypic identification of S.aureus was confirmed. While the mecA gene was detected in all MRSA isolates, no mecC gene was detected in any isolates. Detected SCCmec types were as follows; SCCmec Type 1 (2.6%), Type II (28.4%), Type III (12.9%), Type IVa (11.2%), Type IVb (3.4%), Type IVc (3.4%), Type IVg (12.1%), Type V (0.9%), Type VII (4.3%), Type VIII (18.1%), Type IX (0.9%), Type XII (1.7%). On the other hand, SCCmec Type VI, X, XI and XIII were not found in any isolate. It was determined that four of the MRSA isolates (3.4%) carried the PVL gene that two (50%) of these were found in SCCmec Type VIII.

CONCLUSION:

Monitoring of FOX resistance is an effective and safe method for determination of MRSA isolates. The change in the mec gene causes resistance, which should be monitored regularly with molecular methods. Our study is the first study in Turkey.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Estafilocócicas / Proteínas Bacterianas / Cefoxitina / Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina / Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Indian J Med Microbiol Asunto de la revista: MICROBIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones Estafilocócicas / Proteínas Bacterianas / Cefoxitina / Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina / Reacción en Cadena en Tiempo Real de la Polimerasa Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Indian J Med Microbiol Asunto de la revista: MICROBIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
...