Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Can We Improve the Technique of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises in Postmenopausal Women Using a Single Electromyography Biofeedback Session? An Experimental Study.
Piernicka, Magdalena; Ossowski, Zbigniew; Kortas, Jakub; Bojar, Damian; Labun, Justyna; Szumilewicz, Anna.
Afiliación
  • Piernicka M; Faculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdansk, Poland.
  • Ossowski Z; Faculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdansk, Poland.
  • Kortas J; Faculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdansk, Poland.
  • Bojar D; Faculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdansk, Poland.
  • Labun J; Faculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdansk, Poland.
  • Szumilewicz A; Faculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, 80-336 Gdansk, Poland.
J Clin Med ; 13(11)2024 May 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38892773
ABSTRACT

Background:

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a single session of EMG biofeedback in a group of postmenopausal women on improving technique in pelvic floor muscle (PFM) contractions (exercises).

Methods:

Sixty-two women aged 60 to 85 years (69 ± 4; mean ± SD) participated in the study. We assessed the technique of PFM exercises via surface electromyography (EMG) using a vaginal probe. A single assessment sequence consisted of 11 exercises involving the conscious contraction of the PFM, during which the order of activation for selected muscles was determined. We then awarded scores for exercise technique on a scale from 0 to 4, where 4 represented the best technique and 0 represented no activation of PFMs. In the second assessment, we used a biofeedback method to teach PFM exercise technique.

Results:

In total, 32% (n = 20) of the participants were unable to correctly perform the first PFM contraction, scoring 0.9 ± 0.79. After a single EMG biofeedback session, these women received 1.7 ± 1.08 scores (p = 0.003). In the tenth exercise, there was also a statistically significant improvement between the first (baseline) and second assessment (1.7 ± 1.34 and 2.15 ± 1.09, respectively; p = 0.037). For the remaining exercises, the results were not statistically significant, but we observed a positive trend of change.

Conclusions:

The use of a single EMG biofeedback session is an effective method of improving technique in PFM exercises in a group of women who initially performed them incorrectly.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Polonia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Polonia
...