Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A National Cross-Sectional Survey of EMG Physician Volume.
Nguyen, Thy P; Dongarwar, Deepa; Gupta, Rajesh K; Biliciler, Suur; Sheikh, Kazim A.
Afiliación
  • Nguyen TP; Department of Neurology, University of Texas Houston Health Science Center.
  • Dongarwar D; Department of Neurology, University of Texas Houston Health Science Center.
  • Gupta RK; Department of Neurology, University of Texas Houston Health Science Center.
  • Biliciler S; Department of Neurology, University of Texas Houston Health Science Center.
  • Sheikh KA; Department of Neurology, University of Texas Houston Health Science Center.
Neurol Clin Pract ; 14(5): e200333, 2024 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38919932
ABSTRACT
Background and

Objectives:

This study presents results from a survey of physicians performing electrodiagnostic studies to assess average volume. We also assessed how different factors (trainees, technologists, age of the physician, and case complexity) affected volume. Productivity is an important factor for physicians across practice settings. However, unlike evaluation and management services for neurologists, there are no published data for benchmarks of average volume of electrodiagnostic studies.

Methods:

A 34-question survey was designed collecting information on demographics, electrodiagnostic study volume, technologists, trainees, referrals, and case complexity. The anonymous survey was disseminated through a QR code or hyperlink to multiple online neurology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, electromyography, and neuromuscular forums. The primary outcome was EMG volume including number of EMGs per half-day and EMG volume per year. We conducted bivariate association analysis between primary outcomes and respondent characteristics using the Pearson χ2 test. Multivariable regression models determined factors associated with each of our outcome variables.

Results:

A total of 201 respondents initiated the survey. 71% were certified in adult neurology, 19.6% in physical medicine and rehabilitation, and 2.7% in pediatric neurology. 37.5% practiced in academic medicine. The remaining respondents were from private practice, group, solo, hospital employed, or other. 83% of respondents allotted a dedicated half-day to performing EMGs. The median number of EMGs scheduled during a half-day was within 3-4 (45%). 30% and 7% scheduled 5-6 or more than 7 patients per half-day, respectively. The median number of EMGs performed per year was within 251-500 (37%).

Discussion:

This national, cross-sectional survey evaluates average metrics of EMG volume. Our survey showed that the median number of EMGs annually lies between 251 and 500 studies (37%). In addition, for those respondents who allotted a dedicated half-day to performing EMGs, the median number of EMG studies scheduled per half-day lies between 3 and 4 studies (45%). In multivariate analysis, respondent characteristics of age of the physician (older than 45), working with nerve conduction technologists, and holding the position of EMG director were associated with increased EMG volume.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Neurol Clin Pract Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Neurol Clin Pract Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
...