Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol Versus Once-Daily Fluticasone Furoate in Asthma Patients Aged 5-17 Years.
Bareille, Philippe; Forth, Richard; Imber, Varsha; Bondarenko, Irina; Michaud, Arthur; Majorek-Olechowska, Bernadetta.
Afiliación
  • Bareille P; Respiratory Medicines Discovery & Development, GSK, Stevenage, UK. Electronic address: philippe.j.bareille@gsk.com.
  • Forth R; Biostatistics, GSK, Cary, North Carolina, US.
  • Imber V; Clinical Sciences Respiratory, Research & Development, GSK, Brentford, London, UK.
  • Bondarenko I; Global Medical Services, Parexel, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Michaud A; Clinical Operations, GSK, Brentford, London, UK.
  • Majorek-Olechowska B; Alergo-Med Specialist Medical Clinic, Tarnów, Poland.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38936466
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Limited data exist comparing inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus adjunctive therapy versus ICS alone in pediatric asthma patients.

OBJECTIVE:

Evaluate the efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) versus FF in children and adolescents with asthma.

METHODS:

This Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study (NCT03248128) included participants aged 5-17 years with ≥6 months' asthma history uncontrolled on ICS monotherapy. Participants received 4 weeks' open-label fluticasone propionate (100 µg) twice daily before 11 randomization to 24 weeks' double-blind FF (50 µg100 µg) or FF/VI (50/25 µg100/25 µg) once daily. Two populations with different primary endpoints were analyzed to meet United States (Week 12 weighted mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1; 0-4 hours]; participants aged 5-17 years) and European (change from baseline pre-dose morning peak expiratory flow [ΔAM PEF] averaged over Weeks 1-12; participants aged 5-11 years) regulator requirements.

RESULTS:

Overall, 902 participants were randomized and treated, including 673 children aged 5-11 years. In participants aged 5-17, Week 12 weighted mean FEV1 (0-4 hours) was greater with FF/VI versus FF (difference 0.083 L; P < .001). In participants aged 5-11, ΔAM PEF over Weeks 1-12 showed numerical improvement with FF/VI versus FF but was not statistically significant (difference 3.2 L/minute; P = .228). No drug-related serious adverse events or deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION:

FF/VI significantly improved weighted mean FEV1 (0-4 hours; participants aged 5-17 years), but not ΔAM PEF (participants aged 5-11 years) versus FF. No new safety concerns were apparent.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Asunto de la revista: ALERGIA E IMUNOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article
...