Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Waterpipe Tobacco Brands and Flavors Sold Online in the USA.
Sutfin, Erin L; Lazard, Allison J; Jang, Heesoo; Wagoner, Kimberly G; Reboussin, Beth A; Suerken, Cynthia K; Soule, Eric K; Kimes, Caroline M; Zizzi, Alexandra R; Cornacchione Ross, Jennifer.
Afiliación
  • Sutfin EL; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Lazard AJ; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Jang H; Hussman School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Wagoner KG; Hussman School of Media and Journalism, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
  • Reboussin BA; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Suerken CK; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Soule EK; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Kimes CM; College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA.
  • Zizzi AR; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
  • Cornacchione Ross J; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.
Subst Use Misuse ; 59(11): 1586-1594, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38946151
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Flavor additives are commonly used in combustible tobacco products to mask harshness and increase appeal. However, research on the availability of flavored waterpipe tobacco (WT) is lacking, yet is important to support implementation of policies.

METHODS:

We completed a comprehensive online search in 2020 to identify WT brands and flavors sold online in the USA. We conducted a descriptive content analysis categorizing flavors as explicit (i.e., clear taste/flavor) or concept (i.e., no clear taste/flavor); and coded for 23 flavor descriptors (e.g., fruit, mint/menthol, tobacco). Flavor names were double-coded and discrepancies were resolved by a third coder.

RESULTS:

We identified 66 WT brands with 118 product lines (i.e., sub-brands). We found 2953 flavors, including 1871 unique flavors. Brands averaged 45 flavors (range 1-183). Almost three quarters (73.5%, n = 2171) used explicit flavor names and 26.5% (n = 782) used concept flavor names. Concept flavors varied widely, and included names such as 1001 Nights and California Dream. The most common flavor descriptors were fruit (54.1%) and mint/menthol (12.5%). Tobacco was rarely (0.2%) used as a flavor descriptor. Flavor descriptors also included location (10.7%), color (11.1%), candy (6.3%), cool/ice (5.3%), and alcohol (5.5%).

CONCLUSIONS:

WT is available in 1871 unique flavors, likely contributing to product appeal and use. Like other tobacco products, fruit and mint/menthol are common flavors. Given the significant health consequences associated with WT smoking and the role of flavors in product use, regulatory action specifically targeting WT flavors is urgently needed.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aromatizantes / Tabaco para Pipas de Agua Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Subst Use Misuse Asunto de la revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aromatizantes / Tabaco para Pipas de Agua Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Subst Use Misuse Asunto de la revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...