Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reliability and validity study of the Chinese version of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale in patients with cerebellar injury.
Guo, Jing; Zhang, Yi; Chen, Lu; Wang, Chaolan; Yuan, Xiaofang; Xie, Fan.
Afiliación
  • Guo J; Changzhou First People's Hospital, No. 185, Juqian Street, Tianning District, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
  • Zhang Y; Changzhou First People's Hospital, No. 185, Juqian Street, Tianning District, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China. zhangyizhe1975@163.com.
  • Chen L; Changzhou First People's Hospital, No. 185, Juqian Street, Tianning District, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
  • Wang C; Changzhou First People's Hospital, No. 185, Juqian Street, Tianning District, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
  • Yuan X; Changzhou First People's Hospital, No. 185, Juqian Street, Tianning District, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
  • Xie F; Changzhou First People's Hospital, No. 185, Juqian Street, Tianning District, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Acta Neurol Belg ; 2024 Jul 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38954167
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To preliminarily investigate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Cerebellar Cognitive Affective Syndrome Scale (CCAS scale) in the cerebellar injury population.

METHODS:

In this study, 40 patients with cerebellar injury and 39 normal individuals hospitalized in a stroke center were assessed using the Chinese version of the CCAS scale A, MMSE, and PHQ2, and the results were analyzed using content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, inter- rater agreement, and test-retest reliability.

RESULTS:

The correlation coefficients of semantic fluency, phonemic fluency, category switching, digit span forward, digit span backward, cube, verbal recall, similarities and Go No-Go subscores in the Chinese version of the CCAS scale A were 0.586-0.831 (P ≤ 0.05) with the total score, but there was no significant correlation between the affect and the total score (P = 0.110). The total cognitive score of the Chinese version of the CCAS scale A was correlated with the (r = 0.807, P ≤ 0.01), and the total score of the Chinese version of the CCAS scale A affect was correlated with the total score of PHQ2 (r = 0.884, P ≤ 0.01). The 2 factors were extracted using principal component analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 59.633%. The factor loadings of each of the corresponding factors were > 0.5, indicating good structural validity of the Chinese version of the CCAS scale A. Cronbach α = 0.827 indicated good internal consistency, and inter-rater reliability (ICC > 0.95) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.717-0.895)indicated that the Chinese version of the CCAS scale A had good inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability.

CONCLUSION:

The Chinese version of the CCAS scale A has good reliability and validity in the cerebellar injury population and is useful for screening cerebellar cognitive-emotional syndrome.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Acta Neurol Belg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Acta Neurol Belg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China
...