Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of Xileisan combined with mesalazine for ulcerative colitis: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
Yang, Xin-Yu; Yu, Yun-Feng; Tong, Ke-Ke; Hu, Gang; Yu, Rong; Su, Lian-Jun.
Afiliación
  • Yang XY; School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, Hunan Province, China.
  • Yu YF; School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, Hunan Province, China.
  • Tong KK; School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, Hunan Province, China.
  • Hu G; The First Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410007, Hunan Province, China.
  • Yu R; School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, Hunan Province, China.
  • Su LJ; School of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410208, Hunan Province, China. sulianjun@hnucm.edu.cn.
World J Clin Cases ; 12(21): 4703-4716, 2024 Jul 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39070843
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The benefits and risks of Xileisan (XLS) in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) remain unclear.

AIM:

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of XLS and mesalazine when treating UC.

METHODS:

We searched eight databases for clinical trials evaluating the combination of XLS and mesalazine in the treatment of UC, up to January 2024. Meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) were performed using Revman 5.3 and TSA 0.9.5.10 beta, respectively.

RESULTS:

The present study included 13 clinical studies involving 990 patients, of which 501 patients received XLS combined with mesalazine while 489 patients received mesalazine alone. The meta-analysis showed that, in terms of efficacy, the combination of XLS and mesalazine significantly improved the clinical efficacy rate by 22% [risk ratio (RR) = 1.22; 95%CI 1.15-1.28; P < 0.00001] and mucosal improvement rate by 25% (RR = 1.25; 95%CI 1.12-1.39; P = 0.0001), while significantly reducing the duration of abdominal pain by 2.25 days [mean difference (MD) = -2.25; 95%CI -3.35 to -1.14; P < 0.0001], diarrhea by 2.06 days (MD = -2.06; 95%CI -3.92 to -0.20; P = 0.03), hematochezia by 2.32 days (MD = -2.32; 95%CI -4.02 to -0.62; P = 0.008), tumor necrosis factor alpha by 16.25 ng/mL (MD = -16.25; 95%CI -20.48 to -12.01; P < 0.00001), and interleukin-6 by 14.14 ng/mL (MD = -14.14; 95%CI -24.89 to -3.39; P = 0.01). The TSA indicated conclusiveness in the meta-analysis of the efficacy endpoints. In terms of safety, the meta-analysis revealed that the combination of XLS and mesalazine did not increase the occurrence of total and gastrointestinal adverse events, abdominal distension, and erythema (P > 0.05). The TSA showed non conclusive findings in the meta-analysis of the safety endpoints. Harbord's test showed no publication bias (P = 0.734).

CONCLUSION:

Treatment with XLS alleviated the clinical symptoms, intestinal mucosal injury, and inflammatory response in patients with UC, while demonstrating good safety.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: World J Clin Cases Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: World J Clin Cases Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China
...