Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cluster analysis of adult individuals with type 1 diabetes: Treatment pathways and complications over a five-year follow-up period.
Somolinos-Simón, Francisco J; García-Sáez, Gema; Tapia-Galisteo, Jose; Corcoy, Rosa; Elena Hernando, M.
Afiliación
  • Somolinos-Simón FJ; Centre for Biomedical Technology (CTB), ETSI de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • García-Sáez G; Centre for Biomedical Technology (CTB), ETSI de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; CIBER-BBN, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain. Electronic address: gema.garcia.saez@upm.es.
  • Tapia-Galisteo J; Centre for Biomedical Technology (CTB), ETSI de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; CIBER-BBN, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain.
  • Corcoy R; CIBER-BBN, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain; Departament de Medicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain; Institut de Recerca, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Elena Hernando M; Centre for Biomedical Technology (CTB), ETSI de Telecomunicación, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; CIBER-BBN, ISCIII, Madrid, Spain.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 215: 111803, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39089589
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To identify subgroups of adults with type 1 diabetes and analyse their treatment pathways and risk of diabetes-related complications over a 5-year follow-up.

METHODS:

We performed a k-means cluster analysis using the T1DExchange Registry (n = 6,302) to identify subgroups based on demographic and clinical characteristics. Annual reassessments linked treatment trajectories with these clusters, considering drug and technology use. Complication risks were analysed using Cox regression.

RESULTS:

Five clusters were identified 1) A favourable combination of all variables (31.67 %); 2) Longer diabetes duration (22.63 %); 3) Higher HbA1c levels (13.28 %); 4) Higher BMI (15.25 %); 5) Older age at diagnosis (17.17 %). Two-thirds of patients remained in their initial cluster annually. Technology adoption showed improved glycaemic control over time. Cox proportional hazards showed different risk patterns Cluster 1 had low complication risk; Cluster 2 had the highest risk for retinopathy, coronary artery disease and autonomic neuropathy; Cluster 3 had the highest risk for albuminuria, depression and diabetic ketoacidosis; Cluster 4 had increased risk for multiple complications; Cluster 5 had the highest risk for hypertension and severe hypoglycaemia, with elevated coronary artery disease risk.

CONCLUSIONS:

Clinical characteristics can identify subgroups of patients with T1DM showing differences in treatment and complications during follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Asunto de la revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España
...