Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Upgrading of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer at Prostatectomy: Germline Risk Factors in a Prospective Cohort.
Liss, Michael A; Zeltser, Nicole; Zheng, Yingye; Lopez, Camden; Liu, Menghan; Patel, Yash; Yamaguchi, Takafumi N; Eng, Stefan E; Tian, Mao; Semmes, Oliver John; Lin, Daniel W; Brooks, James D; Wei, John T; Klein, Eric A; Tewari, Ashutosh K; Mosquera, Juan Miguel; Khani, Francesca; Robinson, Brian D; Asad, Muhammad; Troyer, Dean A; Kagan, Jacob; Sanda, Martin G; Thompson, Ian M; Boutros, Paul C; Leach, Robin J.
Afiliación
  • Liss MA; The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Tex, United States.
  • Zeltser N; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
  • Zheng Y; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Lopez C; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Liu M; Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, United States.
  • Patel Y; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States.
  • Yamaguchi TN; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
  • Eng SE; University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
  • Tian M; University of California, Los Angeles, United States.
  • Semmes OJ; Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, United States.
  • Lin DW; University of Washington, Seattle, United States.
  • Brooks JD; Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.
  • Wei JT; University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
  • Klein EA; Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, United States.
  • Tewari AK; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.
  • Mosquera JM; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
  • Khani F; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
  • Robinson BD; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
  • Asad M; Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
  • Troyer DA; Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, United States.
  • Kagan J; National Cancer Institute, United States.
  • Sanda MG; Emory University, Atlanta, United States.
  • Thompson IM; Christus Santa Rosa Health System, San Antonio, United States.
  • Boutros PC; University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.
  • Leach RJ; The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, san antonio, tx, United States.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39158404
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Localized prostate tumors show significant spatial heterogeneity, with regions of high-grade disease adjacent to lower-grade disease. Consequently, prostate cancer biopsies are prone to sampling bias, potentially leading to underestimation of tumor grade. To study the clinical, epidemiologic and molecular hallmarks of this phenomenon, we conducted a prospective study of grade upgrading differences in detected prostate cancer grade between biopsy and surgery.

METHODS:

We established a prospective, multi-institutional cohort of men with Grade Group 1 (GG1) prostate cancer on biopsy who underwent radical prostatectomy. Upgrading was defined as detection of GG2+ in the resected tumor. Germline DNA from 192 subjects was subjected to whole-genome sequencing to quantify ancestry, pathogenic variants in DNA damage response genes and polygenic risk.

RESULTS:

Of 285 men, 67% upgraded at surgery. PSA density and percent of cancer in pre-prostatectomy positive biopsy cores were significantly associated with upgrading. No assessed genetic risk factor was predictive of upgrading, including polygenic risk scores for prostate cancer diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS:

In a cohort of low-grade prostate cancer patients, a majority upgraded at radical prostatectomy. PSA density and percent of cancer in pre-prostatectomy positive biopsy cores portended the presence of higher-grade disease, while germline genetics was not informative in this setting. Patients with low-risk prostate cancer, but elevated PSA density or percent cancer in positive biopsy cores, may benefit from repeat biopsy, additional imaging or other approaches to complement active surveillance. IMPACT Further risk stratification of patients with low-risk prostate cancer may provide useful context for active surveillance decision-making.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Asunto de la revista: BIOQUIMICA / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Asunto de la revista: BIOQUIMICA / EPIDEMIOLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...