Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Concretizing plan specifications as realizables within the OBO foundry.
Duncan, William D; Diller, Matthew; Dooley, Damion; Hogan, William R; Beverley, John.
Afiliación
  • Duncan WD; University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. wdduncan@gmail.com.
  • Diller M; University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
  • Dooley D; Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, CA, Canada.
  • Hogan WR; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
  • Beverley J; University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. johnbeve@buffalo.edu.
J Biomed Semantics ; 15(1): 15, 2024 Aug 20.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39160586
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Within the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontology (OBO) Foundry, many ontologies represent the execution of a plan specification as a process in which a realizable entity that concretizes the plan specification, a "realizable concretization" (RC), is realized. This representation, which we call the "RC-account", provides a straightforward way to relate a plan specification to the entity that bears the realizable concretization and the process that realizes the realizable concretization. However, the adequacy of the RC-account has not been evaluated in the scientific literature. In this manuscript, we provide this evaluation and, thereby, give ontology developers sound reasons to use or not use the RC-account pattern.

RESULTS:

Analysis of the RC-account reveals that it is not adequate for representing failed plans. If the realizable concretization is flawed in some way, it is unclear what (if any) relation holds between the realizable entity and the plan specification. If the execution (i.e., realization) of the realizable concretization fails to carry out the actions given in the plan specification, it is unclear under the RC-account how to directly relate the failed execution to the entity carrying out the instructions given in the plan specification. These issues are exacerbated in the presence of changing plans.

CONCLUSIONS:

We propose two solutions for representing failed plans. The first uses the Common Core Ontologies 'prescribed by' relation to connect a plan specification to the entity or process that utilizes the plan specification as a guide. The second, more complex, solution incorporates the process of creating a plan (in the sense of an intention to execute a plan specification) into the representation of executing plan specifications. We hypothesize that the first solution (i.e., use of 'prescribed by') is adequate for most situations. However, more research is needed to test this hypothesis as well as explore the other solutions presented in this manuscript.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ontologías Biológicas Idioma: En Revista: J Biomed Semantics Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ontologías Biológicas Idioma: En Revista: J Biomed Semantics Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...