Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diet order significantly affects energy balance for diets varying in macronutrients but not ultraprocessing in crossover studies without a washout period.
Sciarrillo, Christina M; Guo, Juen; Hengist, Aaron; Darcey, Valerie L; Hall, Kevin D.
Afiliación
  • Sciarrillo CM; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States.
  • Guo J; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States.
  • Hengist A; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States.
  • Darcey VL; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States.
  • Hall KD; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Bethesda, MD, United States. Electronic address: kevinh@niddk.nih.gov.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 2024 Aug 18.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39163976
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Crossover studies can induce order effects, especially when they lack a washout period.

OBJECTIVES:

We performed secondary analyses comparing groups of subjects randomly assigned to different diet orders in 2 inpatient crossover studies originally designed to compare within-subject differences in ad libitum energy intake. One study compared minimally processed low-carbohydrate (LC) compared with low-fat (LF) diets, and the other matched macronutrients and compared minimally processed food (MPF) with ultraprocessed food (UPF) diets.

METHODS:

Diet order group comparisons of changes in body weight and body composition, and differences in energy expenditure and food intake were assessed over 4 wk in 20 adults randomly assigned to either the LC followed immediately by the LF diet (LC → LF) or the opposite order (LF → LC), and 20 adults randomly assigned to either the MPF followed by the UPF (MPF → UPF) diets or the opposite order (UPF → MPF).

RESULTS:

Subjects randomly assigned to LC → LF lost 2.9 ± 1.1 kg more body weight (P <0.001) and 1.5 ± 0.6 kg more body fat (P = 0.03) than the LF → LC group, likely because the LC → LF group consumed 921 ± 304 kcal/d less than the LF → LC group (P = 0.003). These energy intake differences were driven by the last 2 wk (-1610 ± 312 kcal/d; P < 0.0001), perhaps because of carryover effects of gut adaptations during the first 2 wk arising from large differences in the mass of food (1296 ± 215 g/d; P <0.00001) and fiber consumed (58 ± 6 g/d; P <0.00001). There were no significant diet order effects on energy intake, body weight, or body composition changes between UPF → MPF and MPF → UPF groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Diet order significantly affected energy intake, body weight, and body fat in a 4-wk crossover inpatient diet study varying in macronutrients, but not in a similarly structured study varying in ultraprocessed foods. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03407053 and NCT03878108.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Clin Nutr Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Clin Nutr Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos
...