Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Breast cancer patients' postoperative outcomes in nipple-sparing mastectomy and reconstruction with subpectoral implant placement: a single center experience.
De Luca, Alessandro; Amabile, Maria Ida; Frusone, Federico; Tripodi, Domenico; Costanzo, Maria Ludovica; La Torre, Giuseppe; Marcasciano, Marco; Lo Torto, Federico; Monti, Massimo; Vergine, Massimo; Ribuffo, Diego.
Afiliación
  • De Luca A; Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Amabile MI; Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Frusone F; Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Tripodi D; Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Costanzo ML; Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • La Torre G; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Marcasciano M; Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
  • Lo Torto F; Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Monti M; Department of Surgical Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Vergine M; Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Ribuffo D; Department of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Gland Surg ; 13(7): 1164-1177, 2024 Jul 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39175697
ABSTRACT

Background:

The continuous increase in the rate of nipple sparing mastectomy (NSM), the development of several reconstructive techniques and the following introduction of acellular derma matrix (ADM) has revolutionized implant-based breast reconstruction. This study aimed to investigate postoperative complications, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and patients' satisfaction in patients undergoing NSM and breast reconstruction with or without ADM.

Methods:

Enrolled patients were divided into three groups immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) with definitive implant and ADM (Group A), IBR only with definitive prosthesis (Group B), and two-stage breast reconstruction (Group C). The postoperative complications, BREAST-Q outcomes and reoperations were compared.

Results:

A total of 105 BC patients were enrolled and a total of 139 post-mastectomy breast reconstructions were performed. Seroma was the most prevalent complication observed 8.3% in Group A, 2.9% in Group B and 5.7% in Group C. Postoperative infection occurred in two patients of Group A (5.6%), one patient of Group B (2.9%) and one of Group C (2.9%). Group A reported larger drain volume (1,125±243.5 cc), longer drain period (13.2±2.8 days), and the lowest incidence of capsular contracture (5.6%). The BREAST-Q patient-reported outcome measures document that all patients aged ≥50 years presented a higher score in "Satisfaction with breast" (P<0.001) and "Satisfaction with outcome" domains (P<0.05). Performing a bilateral breast reconstruction was associated to higher scores in "Physical wellbeing chest domain" (P<0.05). In addition, patients in Group A and Group B reported higher score in "Satisfaction with the breast" domain (P<0.001) but only in Group B we reported a higher score in "Satisfaction with outcome" (P<0.001).

Conclusions:

Subpectoral IBR results in manageable complications and greater personal satisfaction. The ADM could improve breast reconstruction reducing the rate of capsular contracture. The prepectoral placement of ADM could minimize complications and optimize aesthetic results.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Gland Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Gland Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia
...