Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Six versus 12-Hours Balloon Catheter Placement for the Induction of Labor: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Rashid, Attyia; Imran, Muhammad; Ali, Shujaat; Mehmood, Areeba Mariam; Khalil, Saba; Farooq, Dawood Azam; Kamran, Ateeba; Zamir, Shamaila; Khan, Ubaid; Abuelazm, Mohamed.
Afiliación
  • Rashid A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Imran M; University College of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan. Electronic address: muhammadimran70115507@gmail.com.
  • Ali S; University College of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Mehmood AM; Faculty of Medicine, Sargodha Medical College, Sargodha, Pakistan.
  • Khalil S; Faculty of Medicine, Fatima Jinnah Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Farooq DA; University College of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Kamran A; Faculty of Medicine, Karachi Medical and Dental College, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Zamir S; Department of Community Medicine, University College of Medicine and Dentistry, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Khan U; Faculty of Medicine, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, USA.
  • Abuelazm M; Facutly of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; : 101474, 2024 Aug 31.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39222844
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Balloon catheters have shown promising results in the induction of labor (IOL); however, evidence regarding the optimal time of balloon catheter placement is still lacking. Thus, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of six-hour placement compared to 12 hours. DATA SOURCE We conducted a comprehensive search through a search strategy across "Embase, SCOPUS, PubMed (via MEDLINE), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL)" from inception until April 20, 2024. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of six-hour balloon catheter placement compared with 12 hours for cervical ripening in IOL. Covidence was used to screen eligible articles.

METHODS:

All relevant outcome data were synthesized using risk ratios (RR) or mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) in meta-analysis models within RevMan 5.4. PROSPERO ID CRD42024540935

RESULTS:

We included five RCTs with 960 women undergoing the IOL with balloon catheter placement. Six-hour placement was associated with significant lower insertion to overall delivery interval (MD -4.25, 95% CI [-5.34, -3.15], P< 0.00001) and insertion to vaginal delivery interval (MD -4.65, 95% CI [-6.08, -3.23], P< 0.00001) without significant difference in BISHOP score change (MD -0.02, 95% CI [-0.23, 0.20], P= 0.88), catheter removal to delivery interval (MD 0.72, 95% CI [-0.39, 1.83], P= 0.20) and total duration of oxytocin infusion (MD -0.36, 95% CI [-0.85, 0.14], P= 0.16) compared to twelve hours. Also, significantly lower overall cesarean delivery (CD) rate (RR 0.81, 95% CI [0.68, 0.96], P= 0.01) and CD due to malpresentation (RR 0.39, 95% CI [0.16, 0.93], P= 0.03) were observed with six-hour placement.

CONCLUSION:

A planned six-hour balloon catheter placement reduced insertion to delivery intervals and CD rate and has equal efficacy in BISHOP score change and catheter removal to delivery interval compared to twelve hours.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Pakistán

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Pakistán
...