Forward-striking technique in simple femoral shaft fractures: a comparative cohort study.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A persistent fracture gap following femoral nailing increases the risk of delayed and nonunion development. A forward-striking technique for reducing the gap in femoral nailing has been described, but its efficacy and therapeutic consequences have not been investigated in comparative studies. We provide the results of a comparative study that investigated the forward-striking technique's efficacy in terms of remaining fracture gaps and surgical outcomes. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2022, a retrospective cohort study was undertaken on 193 skeletal mature patients obtaining reamed femoral nailing for closed femoral shaft fractures. Comparisons of residual fracture gaps, timing to union, complications and re-operation rates were made between 80 patients (41.45%) undergoing femoral nailing with the forward striking procedure and 113 patients (58.55%) undergoing traditional nailing, accompanied by minimal 1-year follow-ups. In addition, the potential difference between fracture gaps before and after applying the forward striking procedure was compared. RESULTS: Both groups had similar age, sex, presence of diabetes, smoking status, body mass index and time to surgery. However, the forward-striking group demonstrated significantly lower rates of postoperative complications, including delayed, nonunion, and the need for re-operation. Conversely, no significant differences were found in time to union (p = 0.222). The forward-striking procedure can significantly reduce residual fracture gaps from 3.99 to 1.66 mm (p < 0.001). No major complications in the forward-striking group including nonunion were observed. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the forward-striking technique effectively reduces residual fracture gap during femoral nailing. The technique not only could be easily performed but is also reproducible. In addition, it can lower the risk of delayed union, nonunion and obviates the necessity for re-operation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III, retrospective cohort study.