Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the role of advanced artificial intelligence as a tool in multidisciplinary tumor board decision-making for recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer cases - the first study on ChatGPT 4o and a comparison to ChatGPT 4.0.
Schmidl, Benedikt; Hütten, Tobias; Pigorsch, Steffi; Stögbauer, Fabian; Hoch, Cosima C; Hussain, Timon; Wollenberg, Barbara; Wirth, Markus.
Afiliación
  • Schmidl B; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Hütten T; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Pigorsch S; Department of RadioOncology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Stögbauer F; Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Hoch CC; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Hussain T; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Wollenberg B; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Wirth M; Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1455413, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39301542
ABSTRACT

Background:

Recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is characterized by a complex therapeutic management that needs to be discussed in multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDT). While artificial intelligence (AI) improved significantly to assist healthcare professionals in making informed treatment decisions for primary cases, an application in the even more complex recurrent/metastatic setting has not been evaluated yet. This study also represents the first evaluation of the recently published LLM ChatGPT 4o, compared to ChatGPT 4.0 for providing therapy recommendations.

Methods:

The therapy recommendations for 100 HNSCC cases generated by each LLM, 50 cases of recurrence and 50 cases of distant metastasis were evaluated by two independent reviewers. The primary outcome measured was the quality of the therapy recommendations measured by the following parameters clinical recommendation, explanation, and summarization.

Results:

In this study, ChatGPT 4o and 4.0 provided mostly general answers for surgery, palliative care, or systemic therapy. ChatGPT 4o proved to be 48.5% faster than ChatGPT 4.0. For clinical recommendation, explanation, and summarization both LLMs obtained high scores in terms of performance of therapy recommendations, with no significant differences between both LLMs, but demonstrated to be mostly an assisting tool, requiring validation by an experienced clinician due to a lack of transparency and sometimes recommending treatment modalities that are not part of the current treatment guidelines.

Conclusion:

This research demonstrates that ChatGPT 4o and 4.0 share a similar performance, while ChatGPT 4o is significantly faster. Since the current versions cannot tailor therapy recommendations, and sometimes recommend incorrect treatment options and lack information on the source material, advanced AI models at the moment can merely assist in the MDT setting for recurrent/metastatic HNSCC.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Base de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Front Oncol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania
...