Glove perforations during open surgery for gynaecological malignancies.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To audit glove perforations at laparotomies for gynaecological cancers. SETTING: Gynaecological oncology unit, cancer centre, London. DESIGN: Prospective audit. SAMPLE Twenty-nine laparotomies for gynaecological cancers over 3 months. METHODS: Gloves used during laparotomies for gynaecological cancer were tested for perforations by the air inflation and water immersion technique. Parameters recorded were type of procedure, localisation of perforation, type of gloves, seniority of surgeon, operation time and awareness of perforations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Glove perforation rate. RESULTS: Perforations were found in gloves from 27/29 (93%) laparotomies. The perforation rate was 61/462 (13%) per glove. The perforation rate was three times higher when the duration of surgery was more than 5 hours. The perforation rate was 63% for primary surgeons, 54.5% for first assistant, 4.7% for second assistant and 40.5% for scrub nurses. Clinical fellows were at highest risk of injury (94%). Two-thirds of perforations were on the index finger or thumb. The glove on the nondominant hand had perforations in 54% of cases. In 50% of cases, the participants were not aware of the perforations. There were less inner glove perforations in double gloves compared with single gloves (5/139 versus 26/154; P = 0.0004, OR = 5.4, 95% CI 1.9-16.7). The indicator glove system failed to identify holes in 44% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Glove perforations were found in most (93%) laparotomies for gynaecological malignancies. They are most common among clinical fellows, are often unnoticed and often not detected by the indicator glove system.