Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimization of conventional water treatment plant using dynamic programming.
Mostafa, Khezri Seyed; Bahareh, Ghafari; Elahe, Dadvar; Pegah, Dadras.
Afiliação
  • Mostafa KS; Department of Environment and Energy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran khezri@sharif.edu.
  • Bahareh G; Department of Environment and Energy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
  • Elahe D; Department of Environment and Energy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
  • Pegah D; Department of Pharmaceutics, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Toxicol Ind Health ; 31(12): 1078-86, 2015 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23625909
ABSTRACT
In this research, the mathematical models, indicating the capability of various units, such as rapid mixing, coagulation and flocculation, sedimentation, and the rapid sand filtration are used. Moreover, cost functions were used for the formulation of conventional water and wastewater treatment plant by applying Clark's formula (Clark, 1982). Also, by applying dynamic programming algorithm, it is easy to design a conventional treatment system with minimal cost. The application of the model for a case reduced the annual cost. This reduction was approximately in the range of 4.5-9.5% considering variable limitations. Sensitivity analysis and prediction of system's feedbacks were performed for different alterations in proportion from parameters optimized amounts. The results indicated (1) that the objective function is more sensitive to design flow rate (Q), (2) the variations in the alum dosage (A), and (3) the sand filter head loss (H). Increasing the inflow by 20%, the total annual cost would increase to about 12.6%, while 20% reduction in inflow leads to 15.2% decrease in the total annual cost. Similarly, 20% increase in alum dosage causes 7.1% increase in the total annual cost, while 20% decrease results in 7.9% decrease in the total annual cost. Furthermore, the pressure decrease causes 2.95 and 3.39% increase and decrease in total annual cost of treatment plants.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Problema de saúde: 2_quimicos_contaminacion Assunto principal: Análise de Sistemas / Purificação da Água / Modelos Teóricos Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Toxicol Ind Health Assunto da revista: MEDICINA OCUPACIONAL / TOXICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 2_ODS3 Problema de saúde: 2_quimicos_contaminacion Assunto principal: Análise de Sistemas / Purificação da Água / Modelos Teóricos Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Toxicol Ind Health Assunto da revista: MEDICINA OCUPACIONAL / TOXICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article
...