Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Interference between active implanted medical devices and electromagnetic field emitting devices is rare but real: results of an incidence study in a population of physicians in France.
Hours, Martine; Khati, Inès; Hamelin, Joel.
Afiliação
  • Hours M; Lyon University, Lyon, France; Lyon-1 University, UMRESTTE, Lyon, France; IFSTTAR, UMRESTTE, Bron, France.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ; 37(3): 290-6, 2014 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24033373
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVE:

Assessing the behavior of active implanted medical devices (AIMDs) in response to electromagnetic field (EMF) transmitters is a current issue of great importance. Given the numerous telecommunication systems and our lack of knowledge as to the impact of electromagnetic effects, this study investigated the reality of possible AIMD disturbance by EMFs by interviewing health professionals.

METHOD:

A self-administered postal questionnaire was sent to almost 5,000 physicians in five specialties cardiology; endocrinology; ears, nose, and throat; urology; and neurology. It collected data on the existence and annual number of incidents observed and the conditions under which they occurred, the EMF sources involved, and the means of managing the malfunctions.

RESULTS:

A total of 1,188 physicians agreed to participate. Sixteen percent of participants reported cases of implant failure, three-quarters of whom, mainly in cardiology, reported rates of at least one incident per year-amounting to more than 100 incidents per year in all. Severity appeared to be moderate (discomfort or transient symptoms), but frequently required resetting or, more rarely, replacing the device. Some serious incidents were, however, reported. The sources implicated were basically of two types electronic security systems (antitheft and airport gates) and medical electromagnetic radiation devices. These incidents were poorly reported within the public health system, preventing follow-up and effective performance of alert and surveillance functions.

CONCLUSION:

Although minor, the risk of interference between EMF sources and AIMDs is real and calls for vigilance. It particularly concerns antitheft and airport security gates, though other sources may also cause incidents.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próteses e Implantes / Artefatos / Eletrodos / Campos Eletromagnéticos / Eletrônica / Falha de Equipamento / Segurança de Equipamentos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próteses e Implantes / Artefatos / Eletrodos / Campos Eletromagnéticos / Eletrônica / Falha de Equipamento / Segurança de Equipamentos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França
...