Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Sulfonylurea monotherapy and emergency room utilization among elderly patients with type 2 diabetes.
Rajpathak, Swapnil N; Fu, Chunmay; Brodovicz, Kimberley; Engel, Samuel S; Heaton, Pamela C.
Afiliação
  • Rajpathak SN; Merck Research Labs, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA. Electronic address: swapnil.rajpathak@merck.com.
  • Fu C; Merck Research Labs, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA.
  • Brodovicz K; Merck Research Labs, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA.
  • Engel SS; Merck Research Labs, Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ, USA.
  • Heaton PC; The James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract ; 109(3): 507-12, 2015 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26123984
ABSTRACT

AIM:

In elderly Americans with type 2 diabetes, use of insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) accounts for almost one-fourth of drug adverse event-related hospitalizations. It is not clear, however, if sulfonylureas (SUs), frequently prescribed OADs known to cause hypoglycemia, increase the risk of emergency room (ER) visits compared to other OADs. The aim of this study was to compare the emergency room utilization between US elderly patients with diabetes on SU monotherapy vs. other non-SU monotherapies.

METHODS:

This retrospective cohort study was conducted using MarketScan(®) database (2009-10) and aimed to evaluate the association between use of SU and ER visits. The analysis included 28,533 patients (aged ≥65 years) receiving SU monotherapy at baseline and 11 propensity score (PS)-matched group receiving monotherapy with other OADs. ER utilization was determined during a 1-year follow-up period.

RESULTS:

The SU and non-SU groups were overall well balanced after PS matching. The mean (SD) number of ER visits during the follow-up was 0.56 among users of SU users compared to 0.49 (P<0.0001) among non-users. In multivariable analysis, the adjusted odds ratios for ≥2 ER visits were 1.21 (95% CI=1.13-1.30) comparing SU users to non-users and 1.31 (95% CI=1.21-1.41) for SU vs. metformin users.

CONCLUSION:

Elderly patients with type 2 diabetes on SU monotherapy were more likely to use ER than those on other monotherapies. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and evaluate other factors associated with ER visits.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compostos de Sulfonilureia / Idoso / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Hipoglicemiantes Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compostos de Sulfonilureia / Idoso / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Hipoglicemiantes Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article
...