Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Integrated Bottom-Up and Top-Down Proteomics of Patient-Derived Breast Tumor Xenografts.
Ntai, Ioanna; LeDuc, Richard D; Fellers, Ryan T; Erdmann-Gilmore, Petra; Davies, Sherri R; Rumsey, Jeanne; Early, Bryan P; Thomas, Paul M; Li, Shunqiang; Compton, Philip D; Ellis, Matthew J C; Ruggles, Kelly V; Fenyö, David; Boja, Emily S; Rodriguez, Henry; Townsend, R Reid; Kelleher, Neil L.
Afiliação
  • Ntai I; From the ‡Proteomics Center of Excellence, §Department of Chemistry, and.
  • LeDuc RD; From the ‡Proteomics Center of Excellence.
  • Fellers RT; From the ‡Proteomics Center of Excellence.
  • Erdmann-Gilmore P; ‖Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110;
  • Davies SR; ‖Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110;
  • Rumsey J; ‖Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110;
  • Early BP; From the ‡Proteomics Center of Excellence.
  • Thomas PM; From the ‡Proteomics Center of Excellence, ¶Department of Molecular BiosciencesNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208;
  • Li S; ‖Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110;
  • Compton PD; From the ‡Proteomics Center of Excellence, ‖Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110;
  • Ellis MJ; **Department of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030;
  • Ruggles KV; ‡‡Center for Health Informatics and Bioinformatics, and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University Medical School, New York, NY 10016;
  • Fenyö D; ‡‡Center for Health Informatics and Bioinformatics, and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, New York University Medical School, New York, NY 10016;
  • Boja ES; §§Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892.
  • Rodriguez H; §§Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892.
  • Townsend RR; ‖Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110; rtownsend@wustl.edu n-kelleher@northwestern.edu.
  • Kelleher NL; From the ‡Proteomics Center of Excellence, §Department of Chemistry, and ¶Department of Molecular BiosciencesNorthwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208; rtownsend@wustl.edu n-kelleher@northwestern.edu.
Mol Cell Proteomics ; 15(1): 45-56, 2016 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26503891
ABSTRACT
Bottom-up proteomics relies on the use of proteases and is the method of choice for identifying thousands of protein groups in complex samples. Top-down proteomics has been shown to be robust for direct analysis of small proteins and offers a solution to the "peptide-to-protein" inference problem inherent with bottom-up approaches. Here, we describe the first large-scale integration of genomic, bottom-up and top-down proteomic data for the comparative analysis of patient-derived mouse xenograft models of basal and luminal B human breast cancer, WHIM2 and WHIM16, respectively. Using these well-characterized xenograft models established by the National Cancer Institute's Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium, we compared and contrasted the performance of bottom-up and top-down proteomics to detect cancer-specific aberrations at the peptide and proteoform levels and to measure differential expression of proteins and proteoforms. Bottom-up proteomic analysis of the tumor xenografts detected almost 10 times as many coding nucleotide polymorphisms and peptides resulting from novel splice junctions than top-down. For proteins in the range of 0-30 kDa, where quantitation was performed using both approaches, bottom-up proteomics quantified 3,519 protein groups from 49,185 peptides, while top-down proteomics quantified 982 proteoforms mapping to 358 proteins. Examples of both concordant and discordant quantitation were found in a ∼6040 ratio, providing a unique opportunity for top-down to fill in missing information. The two techniques showed complementary performance, with bottom-up yielding eight times more identifications of 0-30 kDa proteins in xenograft proteomes, but failing to detect differences in certain posttranslational modifications (PTMs), such as phosphorylation pattern changes of alpha-endosulfine. This work illustrates the potency of a combined bottom-up and top-down proteomics approach to deepen our knowledge of cancer biology, especially when genomic data are available.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Proteoma / Proteômica / Xenoenxertos Limite: Animals / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Mol Cell Proteomics Assunto da revista: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR / BIOQUIMICA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Proteoma / Proteômica / Xenoenxertos Limite: Animals / Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Mol Cell Proteomics Assunto da revista: BIOLOGIA MOLECULAR / BIOQUIMICA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article
...