Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Physician Emergency Preparedness: A National Poll of Physicians.
SteelFisher, Gillian K; Blendon, Robert J; Brulé, Amanda S; Lubell, Keri M; Jackson Brown, Loretta; Batts, Dahna; Ben-Porath, Eran.
Afiliação
  • SteelFisher GK; 1Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health,Boston,Massachusetts.
  • Blendon RJ; 1Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health,Boston,Massachusetts.
  • Brulé AS; 1Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health,Boston,Massachusetts.
  • Lubell KM; 3Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Atlanta,Georgia.
  • Jackson Brown L; 3Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Atlanta,Georgia.
  • Batts D; 3Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,Atlanta,Georgia.
  • Ben-Porath E; 4SSRS,Media,Pennsylvania.
Disaster Med Public Health Prep ; 9(6): 666-80, 2015 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26545188
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To provide a more comprehensive view than previously available of US physician preparedness for public health emergencies, this study examined physicians' assessments of their preparedness, training, participation in institutional activities, information practices, and experiences with patient education. Four kinds of public health emergencies were considered natural disasters, major airborne infections, major foodborne illness outbreaks, and chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, or explosives (CBRNE) incidents.

METHODS:

Between October 19, 2011, and January 11, 2012, researchers conducted a national poll among 1603 practicing physicians in a range of specialties in hospital and nonhospital settings.

RESULTS:

More than one-half of physicians felt prepared to handle a natural disaster, a major outbreak of an airborne infection, or a major foodborne illness outbreak, whereas one-third (34%) felt prepared to handle a CBRNE incident. About one-half of physicians (55%) had participated in training or a conference related to emergencies in the past 2 years. Sizable fractions of physicians were unaware of emergency response tools in their care setting. For example, nearly one-half in hospitals (44%) did not know whether their care setting had an emergency response plan, and less than one-quarter had participated in a drill using such a plan in the past 2 years. Less than one-third (31%) of physicians had signed up to receive alerts in the case of future emergencies. One in 10 reported sharing emergency information with patients at least "sometimes."

CONCLUSIONS:

Significant gaps remain in physician preparedness for public health emergencies, as well as in related training and participation in institutional activities. New efforts, with a focus on possible collaborations between public health institutions and health system leaders combined with effective use of online resources, are needed to bring more physicians on board and to develop relevant and useful key tools. New approaches, including those that rely on different types of care providers, may be needed to enhance patient education regarding emergency preparedness.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 3_ND Problema de saúde: 1_recursos_humanos_saude / 1_surtos_doencas_emergencias / 3_zoonosis Assunto principal: Médicos / Planejamento em Desastres Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 / 3_ND Problema de saúde: 1_recursos_humanos_saude / 1_surtos_doencas_emergencias / 3_zoonosis Assunto principal: Médicos / Planejamento em Desastres Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Disaster Med Public Health Prep Assunto da revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article
...