Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness and Safety of Tissue Expander for Adjuvant Helical Tomotherapy in Curatively Resected Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.
Yu, Jeong Il; Lim, DO Hoon; Park, Hee Chul; Jung, Sang Hoon; Jeon, Seong Jin; Nam, Heerim; Kim, Bokyoung; Kim, Sung-Joo; Park, Jae Berm.
Afiliação
  • Yu JI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lim DH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea dh8.lim@samsung.com.
  • Park HC; Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Jung SH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Jeon SJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Nam H; Department of Radiation Oncology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim B; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sheikh Khalifa Specialist Hospital, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates.
  • Kim SJ; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park JB; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Anticancer Res ; 38(4): 2447-2453, 2018 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29599376
BACKGROUND/AIM: We investigated the effectiveness and safety of using a tissue expander (TE) for adjuvant helical tomotherapy (HT) for curatively resected retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was conducted with 60 RPS patients who underwent curative resection with or without TE insertion followed by HT from June 2009 to December 2016. Among the patients, TE was inserted in 37 (61.7%). The quality of TE insertion was evaluated. Median follow-up after surgery was 19.4 months (range=4.5-93.2 months). RESULTS: A higher biologically-equivalent dose (α/ß=10) was used with patients who had TE insertion (median, 72.0 gray [Gy] vs. 67.1 Gy, p=0.02). The quality of TE insertion was excellent in 18 patients (48.6%), good in 10 (27.0%), fair in seven (18.9%), and poor in two (5.4%). Toxicity was not significantly different according to TE insertion. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 78.2%, and overall survival was 95.6% at 3 years. TE insertion was not a significant factor for LRFS (91.1% in TE vs. 62.9% in non-TE group at 3 years, p=0.62). In the subgroup of patients with R1 or unknown tumor margin status, however, LRFS was marginally higher in the TE insertion group (100.0% in TE vs. 62.9% non-TE group at 3 years, p=0.05). CONCLUSION: HT with TE insertion as adjuvant RT for curatively resected RPS was feasible with acceptable toxicity. In the patients with R1 or unknown tumor margin status, LRFS was marginally higher in the TE insertion group after HT.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retroperitoneais / Sarcoma / Dispositivos para Expansão de Tecidos / Expansão de Tecido Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Anticancer Res Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retroperitoneais / Sarcoma / Dispositivos para Expansão de Tecidos / Expansão de Tecido Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Anticancer Res Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article
...