Collective Conversational Peer Review of Journal Submission: A Tool to Integrate Medical Education and Practice.
Ann Neurosci
; 25(2): 112-119, 2018 Jul.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-30140123
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
In this study, we demonstrate a collective collaborative, conversational, pre-publication peer review of a randomized controlled trial.METHODS:
Using Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist, a group of research-oriented undergraduate medical and pharmacy students and their teacher collectively on an online forum, discuss and review a randomized controlled trial submitted to the Annals of Neurosciences and the explanatory commentary from each reviewer makes a basic scaffold for critical appraisal of the manuscript.RESULTS:
This method provided the opportunity for students to engage in online interactive training and allowed them to understand tools used for critical appraisal of a study. Students were incentivized by the potential publication credit and they look forward to continuing this work and perhaps providing one small step to making medical education more interactive.CONCLUSION:
Open peer review involving a group of reviewers at a time produces multidirectional reviewing concepts, thus helps to improve the quality of paper and also may reduce the time between review and publication.
Texto completo:
1
Coleções:
01-internacional
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Tipo de estudo:
Clinical_trials
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Ann Neurosci
Ano de publicação:
2018
Tipo de documento:
Article
País de afiliação:
Bangladesh