Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
CATARACTS: Challenge on automatic tool annotation for cataRACT surgery.
Al Hajj, Hassan; Lamard, Mathieu; Conze, Pierre-Henri; Roychowdhury, Soumali; Hu, Xiaowei; Marsalkaite, Gabija; Zisimopoulos, Odysseas; Dedmari, Muneer Ahmad; Zhao, Fenqiang; Prellberg, Jonas; Sahu, Manish; Galdran, Adrian; Araújo, Teresa; Vo, Duc My; Panda, Chandan; Dahiya, Navdeep; Kondo, Satoshi; Bian, Zhengbing; Vahdat, Arash; Bialopetravicius, Jonas; Flouty, Evangello; Qiu, Chenhui; Dill, Sabrina; Mukhopadhyay, Anirban; Costa, Pedro; Aresta, Guilherme; Ramamurthy, Senthil; Lee, Sang-Woong; Campilho, Aurélio; Zachow, Stefan; Xia, Shunren; Conjeti, Sailesh; Stoyanov, Danail; Armaitis, Jogundas; Heng, Pheng-Ann; Macready, William G; Cochener, Béatrice; Quellec, Gwenolé.
Afiliação
  • Al Hajj H; Inserm, UMR 1101, Brest, F-29200, France.
  • Lamard M; Inserm, UMR 1101, Brest, F-29200, France; Univ Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, F-29200, France.
  • Conze PH; Inserm, UMR 1101, Brest, F-29200, France; IMT Atlantique, LaTIM UMR 1101, UBL, Brest, F-29200, France.
  • Roychowdhury S; D-Wave Systems Inc., Burnaby, BC, V5G 4M9, Canada.
  • Hu X; Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Marsalkaite G; Oxipit, UAB, Vilnius, LT-10224, Lithuania.
  • Zisimopoulos O; Digital Surgery Ltd, EC1V 2QY, London, UK.
  • Dedmari MA; Chair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Faculty of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching b. Munich, 85748, Germany.
  • Zhao F; Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, HangZhou, 310000, China.
  • Prellberg J; Dept. of Informatics, Carl von Ossietzky University, Oldenburg, 26129, Germany.
  • Sahu M; Department of Visual Data Analysis, Zuse Institute Berlin, Berlin, 14195, Germany.
  • Galdran A; INESC TEC - Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores - Tecnologia e Ciência, Porto, 4200-465, Portugal.
  • Araújo T; Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, 4200-465, Portugal; INESC TEC - Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores - Tecnologia e Ciência, Porto, 4200-465, Portugal.
  • Vo DM; Gachon University, 1342 Seongnamdaero, Sujeonggu, Seongnam, 13120, Korea.
  • Panda C; Epsilon, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560045, India.
  • Dahiya N; Laboratory of Computational Computer Vision, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
  • Kondo S; Konica Minolta, Inc., Osaka, 569-8503, Japan.
  • Bian Z; D-Wave Systems Inc., Burnaby, BC, V5G 4M9, Canada.
  • Vahdat A; D-Wave Systems Inc., Burnaby, BC, V5G 4M9, Canada.
  • Bialopetravicius J; Oxipit, UAB, Vilnius, LT-10224, Lithuania.
  • Flouty E; Digital Surgery Ltd, EC1V 2QY, London, UK.
  • Qiu C; Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, HangZhou, 310000, China.
  • Dill S; Department of Visual Data Analysis, Zuse Institute Berlin, Berlin, 14195, Germany.
  • Mukhopadhyay A; Department of Computer Science, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, 64283, Germany.
  • Costa P; INESC TEC - Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores - Tecnologia e Ciência, Porto, 4200-465, Portugal.
  • Aresta G; Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, 4200-465, Portugal; INESC TEC - Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores - Tecnologia e Ciência, Porto, 4200-465, Portugal.
  • Ramamurthy S; Laboratory of Computational Computer Vision, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA.
  • Lee SW; Gachon University, 1342 Seongnamdaero, Sujeonggu, Seongnam, 13120, Korea.
  • Campilho A; Faculdade de Engenharia, Universidade do Porto, Porto, 4200-465, Portugal; INESC TEC - Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores - Tecnologia e Ciência, Porto, 4200-465, Portugal.
  • Zachow S; Department of Visual Data Analysis, Zuse Institute Berlin, Berlin, 14195, Germany.
  • Xia S; Key Laboratory of Biomedical Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, HangZhou, 310000, China.
  • Conjeti S; Chair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures, Faculty of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, Garching b. Munich, 85748, Germany; German Center for Neurodegenrative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, 53127, Germany.
  • Stoyanov D; Digital Surgery Ltd, EC1V 2QY, London, UK; University College London, Gower Street, WC1E 6BT, London, UK.
  • Armaitis J; Oxipit, UAB, Vilnius, LT-10224, Lithuania.
  • Heng PA; Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
  • Macready WG; D-Wave Systems Inc., Burnaby, BC, V5G 4M9, Canada.
  • Cochener B; Inserm, UMR 1101, Brest, F-29200, France; Univ Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, F-29200, France; Service d'Ophtalmologie, CHRU Brest, Brest, F-29200, France.
  • Quellec G; Inserm, UMR 1101, Brest, F-29200, France. Electronic address: gwenole.quellec@inserm.fr.
Med Image Anal ; 52: 24-41, 2019 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30468970
ABSTRACT
Surgical tool detection is attracting increasing attention from the medical image analysis community. The goal generally is not to precisely locate tools in images, but rather to indicate which tools are being used by the surgeon at each instant. The main motivation for annotating tool usage is to design efficient solutions for surgical workflow analysis, with potential applications in report generation, surgical training and even real-time decision support. Most existing tool annotation algorithms focus on laparoscopic surgeries. However, with 19 million interventions per year, the most common surgical procedure in the world is cataract surgery. The CATARACTS challenge was organized in 2017 to evaluate tool annotation algorithms in the specific context of cataract surgery. It relies on more than nine hours of videos, from 50 cataract surgeries, in which the presence of 21 surgical tools was manually annotated by two experts. With 14 participating teams, this challenge can be considered a success. As might be expected, the submitted solutions are based on deep learning. This paper thoroughly evaluates these solutions in particular, the quality of their annotations are compared to that of human interpretations. Next, lessons learnt from the differential analysis of these solutions are discussed. We expect that they will guide the design of efficient surgery monitoring tools in the near future.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instrumentos Cirúrgicos / Extração de Catarata / Aprendizado Profundo Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Med Image Anal Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Instrumentos Cirúrgicos / Extração de Catarata / Aprendizado Profundo Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Med Image Anal Assunto da revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: França
...