Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Modeling pedigree accuracy and uncertain parentage in single-step genomic evaluations of simulated and US Holstein datasets.
Bradford, H L; Masuda, Y; Cole, J B; Misztal, I; VanRaden, P M.
Afiliação
  • Bradford HL; Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agriculture Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350; Department of Animal and Poultry Science, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg 24061. Electronic address: hbradford@vt.edu.
  • Masuda Y; Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens 30605.
  • Cole JB; Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agriculture Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350.
  • Misztal I; Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens 30605.
  • VanRaden PM; Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, Agriculture Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 20705-2350.
J Dairy Sci ; 102(3): 2308-2318, 2019 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30639024
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to model differences in pedigree accuracy caused by selective genotyping. As genotypes are used to correct pedigree errors, some pedigree relationships are more accurate than others. These accuracy differences can be modeled with uncertain parentage models that distribute the paternal (maternal) contribution across multiple sires (dams). In our case, the parents were the parent on record and an unknown parent group to account for pedigree relationships that were not confirmed through genotypes. Pedigree accuracy was addressed through simulation and through North American Holstein data. Data were simulated to be representative of the dairy industry with heterogeneous pedigree depth, pedigree accuracy, and genotyping. Holstein data were obtained from the official evaluation for milk, fat, and protein. Two models were compared the traditional approach, assuming accurate pedigrees, and uncertain parentage, assuming variable pedigree accuracy. The uncertain parentage model was used to add pedigree relationships for alternative parents when pedigree relationships were not certain. The uncertain parentage model included 2 possible sires (dams) when the sire (dam) could not be confirmed with genotypes. The 2 sires (dams) were the sire (dam) on record with probability 0.90 (0.95) and the unknown parent group for the birth year of the sire (dam) with probability 0.10 (0.05). An additional set of assumptions was tested in simulation to mimic an extensive dairy production system by using a sire probability of 0.75, a dam probability of 0.85, and the remainder attributed to the unknown parent groups. In the simulation, small bias differences occurred between models based on pedigree accuracy and genotype status. Rank correlations were strong between traditional and uncertain parentage models in simulation (≥0.99) and in Holstein (≥0.99). For Holsteins, the estimated breeding value differences between models were small for most animals. Thus, traditional models can continue to be used for dairy genomic prediction despite using genotypes to improve pedigree accuracy. Those genotypes can also be used to discover maternal parentage, specifically maternal grandsires and great grandsires when the dam is not known. More research is needed to understand how to use discovered maternal pedigrees in genetic prediction.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linhagem / Cruzamento / Genoma Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Dairy Sci Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Linhagem / Cruzamento / Genoma Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Dairy Sci Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article
...