Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Early Experience with a Novel Strategy for Assessment of Sepsis Risk: The Shock Huddle.
Stinson, Hannah R; Viteri, Shirley; Koetter, Paige; Stevens, Erica; Remillard, Kristin; Parlow, Rebecca; Setlik, Jennifer; Frizzola, Meg.
Afiliação
  • Stinson HR; Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Del.
  • Viteri S; Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Del.
  • Koetter P; Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pa.
  • Stevens E; Department of Quality and Safety, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Del.
  • Remillard K; Department of Nursing, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Del.
  • Parlow R; Department of Nursing, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Del.
  • Setlik J; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Nemours Children's Hospital, Orlando, Fla.
  • Frizzola M; Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Del.
Pediatr Qual Saf ; 4(4): e197, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31572898
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Severe sepsis/septic shock (SS), a leading cause of death in children, is a complex clinical syndrome that can be challenging to diagnose. To assist with the early and accurate diagnosis of this illness, we instituted an electronic scoring tool and developed a novel strategy for the assessment of currently hospitalized children at risk for SS.

METHODS:

The Shock Tool was created to alert providers to children at risk for SS. Above a threshold score of 45, patients were evaluated by a team from the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), led by the Shock Nurse (RN), a specially trained PICU nurse, to assess their need for further therapies. Data related to this evaluation, termed a Shock Huddle, were collected and reviewed with the intensivist fellow on service.

RESULTS:

Over 1 year, 9,241 hospitalized patients were screened using the Shock Score. There were 206 Shock Huddles on 109 unique patients. Nearly 40% of Shock Huddles included a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention at the time of patient assessment, with the most frequent intervention being a fluid bolus. Shock Huddles resulted in a patient transfer to the PICU 10% of the time.

CONCLUSION:

Implementation of an electronic medical record-based sepsis recognition tool paired with a novel strategy for rapid assessment of at-risk patients by a Shock RN is feasible and offers an alternative strategy to a traditional medical emergency team for the delivery of sepsis-related care. Further study is needed to describe the impact of this process on patient outcomes.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de saúde: 1_sistemas_informacao_saude Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Qual Saf Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 1_ASSA2030 Problema de saúde: 1_sistemas_informacao_saude Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Pediatr Qual Saf Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article
...