Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term outcomes of the frozen elephant trunk procedure: a systematic review.
Tian, David H; Ha, Hakeem; Joshi, Yashutosh; Yan, Tristan D.
Afiliação
  • Tian DH; Collaborative Research (CORE) Group, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
  • Ha H; Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
  • Joshi Y; Collaborative Research (CORE) Group, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
  • Yan TD; Collaborative Research (CORE) Group, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.
Ann Cardiothorac Surg ; 9(3): 144-151, 2020 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32551246
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure remains an increasingly popular approach to address complex multi-segmental aortic pathologies, owing to their ability to promote false lumen thrombosis and reduce the need for second-stage operations. While the short-term outcomes of such procedures have been shown to be acceptable, much less is known regarding long-term outcomes. This systematic review evaluates long-term outcomes of the FET procedure.

METHODS:

Studies with at least 12 months follow-up data on FETs were identified in four electronic databases. All studies were reviewed by two independent researchers and relevant data extracted. Long-term outcomes, including overall survival, freedom from reintervention, and freedom from aortic events, were evaluated using patient data recreated from digitized Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS:

Thirty-seven studies with 4,178 patients were identified. The majority of the studies focused solely on acute dissections. Average follow-up was 3.2 years. Overall survival at 1-, 3-, and 5-year was 89.6%, 85.2%, and 82.0%, respectively. Freedom from reintervention at the same timepoints were 93.9%, 89.3%, and 86.8%, respectively. Mortality, permanent neurological deficit and spinal cord injury were 10.2%, 7.7%, and 6.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Survival after the FET procedure is favorable, though ongoing close serial monitoring is essential to assess for the need for further reintervention. Larger multi-institutional registries are required to provide more robust evidence to better elucidate the patient cohort that would most benefit from the FET.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Systematic_reviews Idioma: En Revista: Ann Cardiothorac Surg Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália
...