Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica coexistence in domestic ruminants in Nigeria: application of a PCR-based tool.
Castilla Gómez de Agüero, Verónica; Luka, Joshua; Gandasegui, Javier; Valderas-García, Elora; Ajanusi, Olorugum Joseph; Chiezey, Ngozi Pauline; Martínez-Valladares, María.
Afiliação
  • Castilla Gómez de Agüero V; Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), Grulleros, León, Spain.
  • Luka J; Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, León, Spain.
  • Gandasegui J; Department of Veterinary Parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Maiduguri, Borno State, Nigeria.
  • Valderas-García E; Instituto de Salud Global de Barcelona (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Ajanusi OJ; Instituto de Ganadería de Montaña (CSIC-Universidad de León), Grulleros, León, Spain.
  • Chiezey NP; Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de León, Campus de Vegazana, León, Spain.
  • Martínez-Valladares M; Department of Veterinary Parasitology and Entomology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 52(6): 3893-3897, 2020 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32583206
ABSTRACT
The distinction between Fasciola hepatica and Fasciola gigantica has been traditionally based on morphological criteria, although accurate recognition of the two flukes is usually difficult because of substantial variations in morphological features. The main aim of this study was to develop a PCR-based assay for discrimination between both species collected in sheep and cattle from Nigeria. A total of 47 animals, 33 cattle and 14 sheep, were sampled, and a single adult fluke was collected from each animal. DNA was extracted from flukes, and primers were designed based on mitochondrial DNA sequences to amplify a 304 bp fragment for the identification of F. hepatica and 752 bp for F. gigantica. PCR products from 12 flukes were sequenced for phylogenetic analysis. A total of 29 out of 47 flukes were identified as F. hepatica and 18 as F. gigantica. Within each host, the percentage of each fluke species was as follows In cattle, 18/33 (54.5%) and 15/33 (45.5%) were F. hepatica and F. gigantica, respectively. In sheep, 11/14 (78.6%) were F. hepatica and 3/14 F. gigantica (21.4%). The phylogenetic analysis confirmed these results. Although the number of flukes collected in sheep was limited, it seems that F. hepatica is more prevalent in sheep than F. gigantica, whereas the percentage of each species was similar in cattle. This study confirms the presence of F. hepatica in Nigeria.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 3_ND Problema de saúde: 3_neglected_diseases / 3_zoonosis Assunto principal: Doenças dos Ovinos / Doenças dos Bovinos / Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase / Fasciola / Fasciolíase Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Trop Anim Health Prod Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Contexto em Saúde: 3_ND Problema de saúde: 3_neglected_diseases / 3_zoonosis Assunto principal: Doenças dos Ovinos / Doenças dos Bovinos / Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase / Fasciola / Fasciolíase Tipo de estudo: Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: Trop Anim Health Prod Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha
...